Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -918. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,771–13,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:38
12,909
-37
16 Sept 2026, 23:59
12,946
-31
14 Sept 2026, 23:39
12,977
-24
13 Sept 2026, 06:18
13,001
-36
11 Sept 2026, 10:18
13,037
-39
8 Sept 2026, 16:15
13,076
-48
5 Sept 2026, 11:56
13,124
-52
3 Sept 2026, 11:39
13,176
-10
2 Sept 2026, 08:28
13,186
-17
1 Sept 2026, 08:53
13,203
-19
31 Aug 2026, 06:56
13,222
-21
30 Aug 2026, 06:13
13,243
-16
29 Aug 2026, 05:03
13,259
-28
28 Aug 2026, 03:53
13,287
-10
27 Aug 2026, 05:05
13,297
-27
26 Aug 2026, 02:03
13,324
-37
25 Aug 2026, 02:52
13,361
-28
23 Aug 2026, 18:14
13,389
-47
22 Aug 2026, 02:47
13,436
-85
20 Aug 2026, 21:36
13,521
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.41%
avg views ÷ 12,909 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.9
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
67 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
1,216
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
105 reactions across 65 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
96
91.4%
❤🔥
9
8.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 جمعه با اخبار مهم بازارهای مالی همراهتون هستیم! 🌍📊
مهمترین اتفاقات و دادههای هفته رو مرور میکنیم و نگاهی به تأثیر اونها بر بازارهای مالی و رویدادهای پیش رو خواهیم داشت. 👀📈
🔔 جمعه منتظر گزارش 963 باشید! 🫶🏻
✴️ 963 | همراه شما در مسیر آگاهی مالی
💡 نکته مالی امروز | برای هزینههای سالانه، ماهانه پسانداز کنید
بعضی هزینهها هر ماه سراغمان نمیآیند، اما قابل پیشبینیاند؛ مثل بیمه، تعمیرات، شهریه، سرویس وسایل یا خریدهای مناسبتی. 💰🗓️
بهجای اینکه موقع رسیدن این هزینهها یکباره به بودجهتان فشار وارد شود، مبلغ تقریبی آن را بر ۱۲ تقسیم کنید و هر ماه سهم کوچکی کنار بگذارید. مثلاً برای یک هزینه ۱۲ میلیونی در سال، ماهانه یک میلیون تومان ذخیره کنید.
📌 هزینهای که زم…
📊 گزارش روزانه بازارهای مالی | 963
📅 سهشنبه ۱ سپتامبر ۲۰۲۶
🔹 مهمترین اخبار امروز
💵 تقویت دلار با افزایش انتظارات انقباضی از فدرال رزرو
دلار به بالاترین سطح دو هفته اخیر رسید؛ معاملهگران پس از انتشار دادههای قوی آمریکا و سیگنالهای انقباضی فدرال رزرو، احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره در ماه سپتامبر را بیشتر در نظر گرفتند.
🛢 افزایش قیمت نفت در سایه ریسکهای عرضه
قیمت نفت اندکی افزایش یافت. نگرانیهای مربوط به عرضه در خاور…
💡 نکته مالی امروز | افزایش درآمد، مجوز افزایش خرج نیست
وقتی درآمد بیشتر میشود، خیلی وقتها هزینهها هم بیسروصدا همراهش بالا میروند؛ غذای گرانتر، خریدهای بیشتر، اشتراکهای جدید و خرجهایی که قبلاً ضروری نبودند. 💸📈
بهتر است با هر افزایش درآمد، قبل از بالا بردن سطح هزینهها، بخشی از مبلغ اضافه را مستقیماً به پسانداز یا سرمایهگذاری اختصاص دهید. اینطوری افزایش درآمد واقعاً باعث بهتر شدن وضعیت مالیتان میشود، نه …
📢 سه شنبه اخبار مهمی در بازارهای مالی داریم! 🌍📊
اتفاقات و دادههای مهمی در راهاند و میتونن روی روند بازارها تأثیرگذار باشن. 👀📈
🔔 برای دنبال کردن مهمترین اخبار و بررسی تأثیر اونها بر بازار، فردا با 963 همراه باشید. 🫶🏻
✴️ 963 | همراه شما در مسیر آگاهی مالی
💡 نکته مالی امروز | تخفیف، پسانداز نیست اگر به آن کالا نیاز ندارید
دیدن تخفیفهای بزرگ میتواند باعث شود خریدی را «فرصت» ببینیم، حتی وقتی اصلاً قصد خرید آن کالا را نداشتیم. 🛍️💸
اگر وسیلهای ۳۰٪ تخفیف خورده اما نیازی به آن ندارید، شما ۳۰٪ صرفهجویی نکردهاید؛ ۷۰٪ قیمت را خرج کردهاید. قبل از خرید تخفیفی، از خودتان بپرسید: «اگر این کالا تخفیف نداشت، باز هم میخواستم بخرمش؟»
📌 تخفیف زمانی سودمند است که روی خریدی اعمال…
📊 گزارش روزانه بازارهای مالی | 963
📅 شنبه ۲۹ آگوست ۲۰۲۶
🔹 مهمترین اخبار بازار
🏦 افزایش احتمال رشد نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو
اظهارات کوین وارش در جکسون هول، انتظارات بازار را به سمت سیاست پولی انقباضیتر سوق داد. معاملهگران احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره در سپتامبر را به حدود ۵۷٪ رساندند.
📈 والاستریت هفته را با رشد به پایان رساند
سهام آمریکا روز جمعه پس از سخنان وارش اندکی کاهش یافت، اما شاخصهای اصلی با حمایت گزارشهای مالی …
💡 نکته مالی امروز | قبل از رسیدن پول، برایش برنامه داشته باشید
اگر قرار است وامی دریافت کنید، پاداشی بگیرید یا مبلغ قابلتوجهی به دستتان برسد، قبل از خرج کردن آن یک جدول هزینه درست کنید. 💰📊
گزینههایی که برای استفاده از پول دارید در جدول بنویسید و سود، هزینه و زیان احتمالی هر گزینه را مشخص کنید. سپس آنها را بر اساس میزان سودمندی و اولویت مرتب کنید؛ گزینهای که بیشترین منفعت و منطقیترین هزینه را دارد، بالاتر قرار ب…
📊 گزارش روزانه بازارهای مالی | 963
📅 جمعه ۲۸ آگوست ۲۰۲۶
🔹 مهمترین اخبار امروز
🏦 وارش: فدرال رزرو به برنامه خود پایبند است
کوین وارش اعلام کرد مبارزه فدرال رزرو با تورم هنوز به پایان نرسیده و در صورت نیاز، آمادگی افزایش نرخ بهره وجود دارد. پس از اظهارات او، احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره در سپتامبر به حدود ۵۸٪ رسید.
🇪🇺 تقویت اروپا با کاهش فشار تورمی
تورم منطقه یورو در ماه آگوست به ۲.۱٪ کاهش یافت و بانک مرکزی اروپا نرخ بهر…
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @rahimiandepartment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@rahimiandepartment edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
شیمی امید مصلایی رایگان @shimie_mosalai · 34,861 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
شیمی فراهانی @parsa_farahanii · 31,053 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
یکتا 1406 @yektatarmiim · 24,259 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
شیمی مصلایی 1404 @shimii_mosalaei · 34,641 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال پایه دوازدهم @davzdahumiae · 68,033 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“963⌛️” (@rahimiandepartment), 12,909 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahimiandepartment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.