قبولی نهایی بانک کشاورزی... بدون هیچ امتیازی🔥... اینجاست که باید بگی؛ قبولی نوش جونت رفیق💥
❤30👏7👌3💯2🍾1

Channel
@raheeestekhdam2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
32,028subscribers
+78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002372774509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raheeestekhdam2 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raheeestekhdam2 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 32,028 | -29 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 32,057 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 32,063 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:03 | 32,071 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 32,082 | +222 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 31,860 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 31,880 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 31,876 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 31,889 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 31,888 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 31,889 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 31,890 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 31,887 | -30 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 31,917 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 31,923 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 31,934 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 31,947 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 31,956 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 31,947 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 31,944 | first reading |
125 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 125 (1 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 195,164 |
| Reactions total | 771 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,580 reactions across 123 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 921 | 58.3% | |
| 👍 | 274 | 17.3% | |
| 🙏 | 125 | 7.91% | |
| 💯 | 70 | 4.43% | |
| 👌 | 50 | 3.16% | |
| 👏 | 47 | 2.97% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 1.20% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 0.823% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 0.696% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 0.696% | |
| 🥴 | 9 | 0.57% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 0.443% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.38% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 0.253% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.19% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.127% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.063% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.063% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 123 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,580 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قبولی نهایی بانک کشاورزی... بدون هیچ امتیازی🔥... اینجاست که باید بگی؛ قبولی نوش جونت رفیق💥
❤30👏7👌3💯2🍾1
رفقاااای جان... اگه میخواین اطلاعات عمومی یه درصد خوبی بزنید...😉 لطفا بجای ساعت ها اکسپلورگردی بی نتیجه...😵 روزی یه ساعت وقت بذارین و نکات و تستای این کانالو👇بزنید ... روز آزمونت می بینی چقد سوالات واست آشناس😍 ⛓ https://t.me/ettelaatomumirah
🙏7❤5👍5👏2
✏️سوالات اطلاعات عمومی آزمون های استخدامی اخیر: ↖️سوالات اطلاعات عمومی قوه قضائیه ۱۴۰۴ ↖️سوالات اطلاعات عمومی استخدامی دهیاری ها ۱۴۰۴ ↖️سوالات اطلاعات عمومی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۴ ↖️سوالات اطلاعات عمومی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵
❤3🙏2👏1
هم تمیز و مرتب...هم کیفیت چاپ و مطالب عالی...⭐️ دقیقا مناسب آزمونای استخدامی... حجم شونم محشره...😍
❤4🙏2👏1
⭐️جزوه ی اطلاعات عمومی، ویژه ی آزمون های استخدامی⭐️ ⚫ یه جزوه ی خلاصه... که حجمش خسته و بی انگیزت نمیکنه... ⚫ ولی تمااام نکات مهم و تستی آزمون استخدامیو داره... ⚫ یعنی تمام مباحثی که تا حالا تو استخدامیا موضوعیت داشتنو، این جزوه داره. 🚫 و حتی یه فصل داره، که تماااام نکات سوالات استخدامی ادوار گذشته رو، به صورت نکته ای دسته بندی کرده، این یعنی سوالات تکراری تو مشتته. ⚫ چاپ و فنر کشی شده، میاد دم در خونه تون. …
❤3💯1🙏1
✅کدام کشور به صورت فدرال اداره نمی شود و قانون اساسی ندارد؟ انگلیس
❤3
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: کدام کشور قانون اساسی تدوین نکرده است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
✅پاسخ تشریحیش رو حتما بخون⭐️
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: تابلوی ضامن آهو برای کدام هنرمند است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
✅ عملیات های مهم دفاع مقدس هم... جز سوالات پرتکرار استخدامیا هستن
❤2
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: نام عملیات فتح هویزه چیست؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✅نکات فصل آخر جزوه، به شدت مهمه رفقا☺️
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @raheeestekhdam2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 44 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: کدام کشور قانون اساسی تدوین نکرده است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: تابلوی ضامن آهو برای کدام هنرمند است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: نام عملیات فتح هویزه چیست؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: پایتخت تمدن ایلام کدام شهر بود؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: نظر امام خمینی در مورد انقلاب اسلامی چه بود؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⁉️استخدامی کمیته امداد ۱۴۰۵: پس از حکومت افشاریه کدام سلسله آغاز شد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گروه آموزشی راه استخدام” (@raheeestekhdam2), 32,028 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raheeestekhdam2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.