Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RAED CRYPTO

@raedcrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,731subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001334156782
TypeChannel
Username@raedcrypto
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/raedcrypto

Growth

1,7311,7391,7357 August 2026 — 1,739 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,739 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,736 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,731 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,730–1,740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:151,731-5
10 Aug 2026, 07:501,736-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:161,739no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:041,739first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21m 38s
Average length
7m 13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

16 Feb 2024, 17:10 UTC≈3,520 viewsread 7 August 2026

الناس الي دخلت من هون ، زي ما حكينا بالفيديو اجني نصف الارباح فقط ،

16 Feb 2024, 17:10 UTC≈3,520 viewsread 7 August 2026

تبعوا معي رح يكون في شورت قريب رح احكيلكم عنو قبل ،

16 Feb 2024, 17:10 UTC≈3,460 viewsread 7 August 2026

جيف بيزوس يبيع اكثر من ١٢ مليار دولار من اسهمه في امازون

12 Feb 2024, 17:26 UTC≈3,630 viewsread 7 August 2026

قي تصحيح قريبا، بكرا بالتحليل اللايف بنعطي تفاصيل اكثر

9 Feb 2024, 11:45 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jan 2024, 17:57 UTC≈3,330 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

المحطة القادمة للبيتكوين؟

  1. 38k43%
  2. 45k57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jan 2024, 11:42 UTC≈3,410 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

طبعاً هون مهم جداً اقترب انه يصبح صفر بعدين يدخل بالموجب

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @raedcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jan 2024, 17:57 UTCAnonymous Poll388 voters

المحطة القادمة للبيتكوين؟

  1. 38k43%
  2. 45k57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2024 to 16 April 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 613,364 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RAED CRYPTO” (@raedcrypto), 1,731 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raedcrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.