2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,118–2,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 20:31
2,120
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:58
2,120
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈964
Videos
≈630
Links
≈1,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 54s
Average length
1m 22s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
604 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
116
19.2%
❤
99
16.4%
👏
77
12.7%
💩
62
10.3%
🔥
49
8.11%
🤬
42
6.95%
🤮
38
6.29%
🙏
25
4.14%
😁
24
3.97%
😢
24
3.97%
🤡
21
3.48%
💯
9
1.49%
🍾
4
0.662%
😐
3
0.497%
🤨
3
0.497%
🤔
2
0.331%
🤣
2
0.331%
👎
1
0.166%
🖕
1
0.166%
😱
1
0.166%
1 further kind
1
0.166%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 604reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2025 to 16 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
TELEGRAM E CONTROINFORMAZIONE NEL MIRINO DI BOT PEDOPORNOG***I
Ieri Giubbe Rosse ha riportato che nei prossimi mesi l’Unione Europea preparerà una stretta su Signal e Telegram, usando come motivazione ufficiale la presenza di contenuti pedopornografici.
Nello stesso periodo, noi e altri canali abbiamo notato che tutti i canali della controinformazione sono sotto attacco: bot e messaggi sospetti arrivano a raffica.
M…
Non solo dazi per Trump: a Washington il nuovo mistero si chiama “Project Preserve Destiny” | L'Espresso
https://lespresso.it/c/mondo/2025/7/16/washington-nuovo-mistero-project-preserve-destiny/55642?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwLnCvZjbGNrAucKTmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEeWj3wLLV_3NtmNye0kqUNu7JaxJd9fSYie4G0MZi4tDF2kiMXKz6_eFxlqOI_aem_yBbXVzzm1zlVmSW8e4OLhQ
Signore e signori: Maurizio Molinari, ex direttore de "la Repubblica" fino a ottobre scorso (e comprendiamo il perché). Come diceva John Wick? "Io sono al servizio e voglio servire" (cit)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @radius23m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Radius 23” (@radius23m), 2,120 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radius23m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
