Channel
@raddy_skam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001515068102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raddy_skam |
| Created | 20 January 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raddy_skam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 23 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 24 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 24 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 87 | 73.7% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.24% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2023 to 24 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мало кто знает, но помимо рекламы лохотронов, казино. 🎰 Шилов, создал своё собственное казино «Рыжий пёс» (естественно казино уже сдулось, как и деньги людей, которые пополняли счёт) В интернете мало информаций о данном казино. Но вся информация, которая есть - негативная. Не удивительно. Шилов, надеялся что с помощью «популярного» канала, он сможет нагнать аудиторию на своё казино. Но как видим «Рыжий пёс» не до…
👍12🤬6🤡3😨2
На канале «Дон Симон» появился репост о разводе Шилова. Спустя пару часов, пост был удалён. Как сообщает нам Дон Сифон. Поплывок его просил снести пост. (неудивительно, захотел свои следы за собой почистить) Удаляй, не удаляй. Пруфы быстро разошлись по каналам.
👍26👏2
А помощниками, сегодня были - «Интересные путешествия» https://youtube.com/@InTravel39 https://t.me/intravel39 Действительно, интересное путешествие получилось в мир скама 👍
🔥11👍8👎2
Дима спалил свою скам - схему, обидно ☹️ Модераторы в чате, пытались но не успевали всех быстро банить. Как только начинались сообщения связанные с фейковыми картами, спустя пару секунд - блокируют в чате людей. Придумал «хорошую» схему заработать и прорекламировать контору. А в итоге, сам же наступил на свои грабли, и сам же всё спалил у себя на стриме. Плохо подготовился, плохо.
👍14
Самодонат. В начале стрима, у Димы на шкале донатов было - 11к В статистике 204к (за последний месяц) = спустя 2,5 часа = Замечаем на шкале донатов - 203к А в статистике - 298к А где же ещё 100к донатов? Ответ очевиден. Самодонат. А для чего самодонат был? Всё просто. Чтобы аудитория из хомячков повелась на скам-схему от Димы. Потенциальный хомяк, видит как бегут донаты (самодонаты) и как люди (фейковые донаты,…
👍13
Ещё один победитель 🥳 С первого раза - ничего не выиграла. Со второго раза - выиграла 🎉 Правда почему то опять карты неверные, но выигрыш Дима как то отправил 🙃
👍11
Фейковый победитель, или как Дмитрий Шилов разводит свою аудиторию 🤡
👍3👏3🤬2
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @raddy_skam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Raddy Skam” (@raddy_skam), 23 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raddy_skam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.