Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PlumCrazyRach's Reviews

Channel

PlumCrazyRach's Reviews

@rachelsreview

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002511749602
TypeChannel
Username@rachelsreview
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 1 June 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rachelsreview

Growth

54605713 August 2026 — 54 subscribers14 August 2026 — 54 subscribers20 August 2026 — 57 subscribers28 August 2026 — 60 subscribers13 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 18:0660+3
20 Aug 2026, 22:2357+3
14 Aug 2026, 09:1854no change
13 Aug 2026, 23:4954first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC72 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

What can I say about @PlumCrazyRach other than her promo is AMAZING! We have been networking for years and this is the type of results that always keep me coming back for more!

20 Jul 2026, 01:31 UTC114 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Custom Giantess vid i made for a fan... his review. Want it? 💌DM ME @plumcrazyrach

24 Mar 2026, 00:30 UTC395 viewsread 13 August 2026

@PlumCrazyRach Pushed consistently and delivering real fans - starting promos in a timely manner, a responsible and skilled seller 🤗

9 Sept 2025, 04:30 UTC445 viewsread 13 August 2026

Thank you for your gg’s & being so kind & communicating with me through it all.🩷😚🫶🏼 definitely made my money back!! She has legit real spenders & I would recommend her to anyone!🩷🩷

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rachelsreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PlumCrazyRach's Reviews” (@rachelsreview), 60 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rachelsreview.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.