Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ꪚꪋ૮ꫝꫀꪶ ଓꫀꪜꫀꪚꪶꪗ

@rachelbeverly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003778676255
TypeChannel
Username@rachelbeverly
DescriptionДобро пожаловать! Здесь про скорость, сольный проект и бешеный темп 🔥 Второй канал со всеми соцсетями 👇 https://t.me/rachel_beverly Нахожусь под крылом замечательной компании: https://t.me/SW_entertainment_oi
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rachelbeverly

Growth

1110 Aug 2026, 20:16 — 11 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 11 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:1612 Aug 2026, 06:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:1611no change
10 Aug 2026, 20:1611first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
209.5%
avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total461
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2458.5%
🥰717.1%
🔥49.76%
👍37.32%
👏12.44%
😍12.44%
🤯12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rachelbeverly. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC59 views6 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
File

𝑅𝐴𝐶𝐻𝐸𝐿 𝐵𝐸𝑉𝐸𝑅𝐿𝑌 ⊹ ⊹ | 𝑉𝑂𝐶𝐴𝐿 𝑃𝑅𝐴𝐶𝑇𝐼𝐶𝐸 | :☽︎️️️️️️ Я нᥲдᥱюᥴь ʙᥲⲙ ᥰ᧐нρᥲʙᥙᴛьᥴя! Я ᧐чᥱнь ᥴᴛᥲρᥲ᧘ᥲᥴь, нᥲдᥱюᥴь уʙᥙдᥱᴛь ʙᥲɯᥙ ρᥱᥲκцᥙᥙ ᥙ κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥲρᥙᥙ! Вᥱдь я чᥙᴛᥲю κᥲждыᥔ, ᥙ ⲙнᥱ ᧐чᥱнь ᥰρᥙяᴛн᧐ ᤋнᥲᴛь, чᴛ᧐ ʙᥲⲙ нρᥲʙᥙᴛьᥴя, ᥲ ᴦдᥱ нужн᧐ у᧘учɯᥙᴛь! Вы дᥲᥱᴛᥱ ɯᥲнᥴ ᥴᴛᥲн᧐ʙᥙᴛьᥴя ⲙнᥱ ᥙ κ᧐ⲙᥰᥲнᥙᥙ 𐍃W - ᧘учɯᥱ! #vocalpractice #rachel #soloartist #SW

2🔥2🤯1😍1

8 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC12 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

:❕️️️️Сегодня ровно в 12 по мск - выйдет практика на S.H.I.T.!

3

7 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC12 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

ХОТИТЕ ЛИ ВЫ ПРАКТИКУ НА SUGAR HONEY ICE TEA - BM?

  1. Да83%
  2. Нет17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

7 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC67 views6 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

𝑅𝐴𝐶𝐻𝐸𝐿 𝐵𝐸𝑉𝐸𝑅𝐿𝑌 ⊹ ⊹ | 𝑉𝑂𝐶𝐴𝐿 𝐶𝑂𝑉𝐸𝑅 | :☽︎️️️️️️ 𐋏ᥲдᥱюᥴь ʙᥲⲙ ᥰ᧐нρᥲʙᥙᴛьᥴя ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ κᥲʙᥱρ, ʙ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ ρᥲᤋ я ᥰыᴛᥲ᧘ᥲᥴь ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲᴛь чᴛ᧐-ᴛ᧐ дᥱ᧘ьн᧐ᥱ, ᥙ чᴛ᧐ нᥱ δудᥱᴛ ρᥱᤋᥲᴛь уɯᥙ! Жду ʙᥲɯᥙ᥊ ρᥱᥲκцᥙᥔ ᥙ κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥲρᥙᥱʙ! #rachel #sw #солоартист #кавер

4🔥1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

:❕️️️️️️️ⲠⲢⲈⲆⲨⲠⲢⲈⲮⲆⲈⲎⳘⲈ: 𐌿ᥱᥴню Friᥱᥒɗs 𐌏ᥒ Tɦᥱ 𐌏ᴛɦᥱr 𐍃iɗᥱ, я ᥴᥰ᧐ю ᥰ᧐д ᧐ρᥙᴦᥙнᥲ᧘ьн᧐ᥱ ᤋʙучᥲнᥙᥱ ᥙᤋ ⲙу᧘ьᴛᥙκᥲ, ᴛᥲκ κᥲκ ᥰᥱᥴню ᥰ᧐чᴛᥙ нᥙκ᧐ᴦдᥲ нᥱ ᥴ᧘уɯᥲ᧘ᥲ, ᥙ ⲙᥲ᧘᧐ κᥲκ ᥰ᧐ⲙню κᥲκ᧐ᥔ ᴛᥲⲙ ρᥙᴛⲙ, ᥙ чᴛ᧐δы ᧐ρᥙᥱнᴛᥙρ᧐ʙᥲᴛьᥴя ᥰρᥲʙᥙ᧘ьн᧐ - ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲю κᥲʙᥱρ ᥰ᧐д ᧐ρᥙᴦᥙнᥲ᧘ьную ⲙуᤋыκу, н᧐ ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲю ᥱᴦ᧐ ⲙᥲκᥴᥙⲙᥲ᧘ьн᧐ ᴛᥙ᥊᧐, ᥱᥴ᧘ᥙ ʙᥴᥱⲙ ᤋᥲ᥊᧐чᥱᴛᥴя ᥰ᧐ᤋжᥱ ᥰ᧐ᥴ᧘уɯᥲᴛь ᥲκᥲᥰᥱ᧘᧘у - я ʙыᥴᴛᥲʙ᧘ю ᥙ ᥱᥱ. ☽︎️️️️️️

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rachelbeverly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTCFinal Results6 voters

ХОТИТЕ ЛИ ВЫ ПРАКТИКУ НА SUGAR HONEY ICE TEA - BM?

  1. Да83%
  2. Нет17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTCFinal Results4 voters

КАКОЙ КАВЕР В ИТОГЕ ДЕЛАТЬ?

  1. Paint The Town Red75%
  2. Край суровый, в море льда50%
  3. Friends On The Other Side (The Princess and the Fog)25%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 818,689 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ꪚꪋ૮ꫝꫀꪶ ଓꫀꪜꫀꪚꪶꪗ” (@rachelbeverly), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rachelbeverly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.