Video message, posted without a caption
🔥11👍2

Channel
@rabizov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
354subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001539716875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rabizov |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rabizov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 354 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 356 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 355 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 355 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
192 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 78 | 40.6% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 32.8% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 9.38% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 7.81% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.56% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.521% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rabizov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 October 2025 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥11👍2
Продажа детской квартиры – когда опека будет против? 🤔 Вероятно, для кого-то из моих подписчиков этот вопрос будет актуален в ближайшем будущем. Надеюсь, будет полезно 👇 Вы знали, что для обмена квартиры с «детскими долями» (т.е. с долями несовершеннолетних детей в праве собственности на квартиру) на новую квартиру, пускай даже и большей площади, необходимо предварительно получить письменное разрешение органа опеки…
👍3❤1🔥1
Всего-то 2 часа в Мособлсуде 🎉 фантастика, не иначе… Как говорится, с утра отсудился – весь день свободен 😂 Шутки шутками, а ведь судебные задержки – это реальный бич каждого практикующего судебного юриста и адвоката. Коллеги не дадут соврать! Порой бывает просто невозможно нормально планировать свой рабочий день, ведь в этой лотерее всё всегда непредсказуемо 🫠 Полагаю, здесь приходят в действие сложные парадоксы …
🔥3💯2
Video message, posted without a caption
👍7🔥4
Лучшее место для ареста, или история арестанта в квадрате # Не думал я, что буду когда-либо цитировать «Кровавую барыню» (в миру Ксению Анатольевну), но удержаться было не в моих силах, каюсь. С мест сообщают, что сотрудники УФСБ России по Забайкальскому краю арестовали заключённого, уже находящегося в камере. Дверь не выламывали, зашли с ключа. Установлено, что фигурант с 18 лет многократно привлекался к уголовной…
❤3🔥3
Право приёмных родителей на отпуск по уходу за ребенком. Позиция Конституционного Суда 🏛 С удивлением для себя узнал, что до недавнего времени приёмные семьи сталкивались с пренеприятнейшим законодательным пробелом. Оказывается, на приёмных родителей не распространялись предусмотренные законом гарантии на оплачиваемый отпуск по уходу за ребёнком. Сказать, что я был удивлен, – ничего не сказать! 🤔 Ведь институт при…
👍4
О насущном 😐 Честно говоря, не знаю, законно ли ещё шутить на тему ВПН или это уже наказуемо, но всё же рискну. Вспомнил лихие нулевые – времена безудержного, свободного интырнета – проснулся в холодном поту! Пойду сверюсь с «белыми списками» и полистаю КоАП на предмет нововведений. Всех с праздничком, товарищи! Трудитес! 👌 Пс.: Кто тут нарушает?) #юмор #законы #адвокат #впн
😁7❤4👍2
Даёшь бой потребительскому хулиганству и злоупотреблениям! 🥊 Спустя долгие месяцы изнурительной судебной работы мне удалось отстоять права ветеринарной клиники и защитить деловую репутацию доверителя и его сотрудников! Победили в апелляции с разгромным счётом! Ура! 🎉 ПыСы.: концовка кружка: «… и добиться того, чтобы Мосгорсуд встал на нашу сторону!» [кружочек оборвался в самом конце – то ли времени не хватило, то л…
🔥12👌5❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥11👍5
Вещаю из заснеженной Калуги! ❄️ Об алиментах, праздниках и работе в доставке о трудах праведных и не очень. Всех с Новым годом, прошедшим Рождеством и наступившим праздником Крещения! 🎄 Вы знали, что с 2026 у нас изменился порядок расчёта алиментов? Дорогие мамочки, потираем ладошки и считаем денежки!💰 #алименты #адвокат #Калуга
👍9
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥12❤1
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rabizov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос на засыпку! А на каких телесериалах вы в своё время «постигали азы» криминальных движений по ТВ? 🧐
The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Каков исход дела? Ваши ставки? 🤨
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RÁBIZOV | АДВОКАТ ПО ГРАЖДАНСКИМ И СЕМЕЙНЫМ ДЕЛАМ” (@rabizov), 354 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rabizov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.