Gaming โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 23 days, net +354. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 59,227โ61,249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:40
61,016
+1,556
15 Sept 2026, 21:17
59,460
-254
14 Sept 2026, 05:38
59,714
-103
12 Sept 2026, 13:59
59,817
-170
10 Sept 2026, 09:22
59,987
-37
7 Sept 2026, 05:40
60,024
-95
4 Sept 2026, 12:17
60,119
+101
3 Sept 2026, 00:35
60,018
-136
1 Sept 2026, 21:15
60,154
-32
31 Aug 2026, 20:43
60,186
-239
30 Aug 2026, 18:06
60,425
-66
29 Aug 2026, 20:33
60,491
-226
28 Aug 2026, 21:42
60,717
+287
28 Aug 2026, 00:22
60,430
-139
27 Aug 2026, 01:56
60,569
-93
26 Aug 2026, 11:42
60,662
no change
26 Aug 2026, 11:30
60,662
first reading
Engagement
874 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
0.121%
avg views รท 61,016 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.0
836 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
841
of 874 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 260 of 836 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
874 (26 August 2026 โ 25 September 2026)
Views total
61,862
Reactions total
430
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ208,000
Videos
โ3,240
Links
โ16,800
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 25 September 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
444 reactions across 261 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
400
90.1%
๐ฅ
19
4.28%
๐ฑ
10
2.25%
๐
3
0.676%
โคโ๐ฅ
2
0.45%
๐
2
0.45%
๐
2
0.45%
๐ฅฐ
2
0.45%
๐
1
0.225%
๐
1
0.225%
๐
1
0.225%
๐
1
0.225%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 274 of the 874 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 444 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 874 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Signed ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐
Showing the 12 most recent of 874 posts we hold for @raafatezzat10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
ุฌุฑูุจ ุจูุณ ู ูุจุงูู | eFootball mobile @efootball_N1 ยท 3,601#3
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
MALAK GAMING๐ฅฑ @malak_mohamed78 ยท 128,366 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 2 here โ alongside 1 other โ read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โRaafat Gaming Stโฝ ๐ช๐ฌโ (@raafatezzat10), 61,016 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raafatezzat10.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
