Doorbell with 2-way coms, without camera but on battery Hi, I am looking for a doorbell that is powered by battery, but without a camera. It must support 2-way communication, so I can speak with the person ringing, either via a physical receiver in the apartment or an app. There are plenty options with camera, but I find it super hard to find one without. The no camera thing is mostly due to a law here, that you c…

Channel
/r/privacy
@r_privacy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
818subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001327866738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r_privacy |
| Created | 21 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r_privacy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 818 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 813 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 811 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.99%
- avg views ÷ 818 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.3
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 326 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Privacy and a NAS I’ve been exploring a NAS system - current use case is hold my photos (dabble in photography so I have a lot of photos) important documents and maybe a small media collection. I may put together a Plex server, but don’t expect to amass a huge collection like some people do - it’d just be for me mostly, things I’d actually watch again and love vs. everything. I was leaning toward a system out of th…
Reddit privacy Hi, I wanted to use a more privacy-friendly Reddit client, but I didn't know how private or which one was better. For now I have these options: RedReader Continuum Morphe Reddit Web version with brave I'm on Android. Which one should I use and why? Also, which would be the order of privacy? https://redd.it/1vh3rju @r_privacy
Does YouTube collect same analytics as Google / Gmail apps? I don’t use Google or Gmail but I subscribe to Youtube music. Does the YouTube and Music app collect data about devices, nearby MAC, nearby Bluetooth devices, or any other of the same google collection methods? is it isolated to YouTube or shared throughout the google ecosystem? I sub because I get music content plus no ads on video content. I know about …
Efficient method to delete old unused or unwanted accounts? I am new to privacy principles and I am trying to see if there’s a more efficient method to delete old unused or unwanted accounts. I never kept a list of accounts I had made on various websites so I am going through the painstaking of going through my e-mails and attempting to login to websites with the subscribed e-mail address. Some websites will let you…
What are some good free, linux friendly, open-source voice changers for privacy? So like of I wanted a voice changer that does not allow me to be identified, what would it be? I am looking for something where I can use different voices for different online calls. Any recommendations? https://redd.it/1vgojae @r_privacy
Could age verification be possible without giving potentially malicious actors sensitive info. /genq I do think age verification in its current state (Persona's face check etc.) are awful and dangerous forms of age verification, but I do think age verification is necessary just out of fear of children being traumatized. I know it should be the parents responsibility, but lets be honest, a lot of parents are fuckin…
Security or Surveillance? SEC Purchased 1 Billion+ Passenger Records From Airlines https://www.pcmag.com/news/security-or-surveillance-sec-purchased-1-billion-plus-passenger-records https://redd.it/1vgno0b @r_privacy
Mooresville police officer accused of using Flock cameras to track boyfriend’s ex-wife https://www.wbtv.com/video/2026/08/05/mooresville-police-officer-accused-using-flock-cameras-track-boyfriends-ex-wife/ https://redd.it/1vgk3fk @r_privacy
Walmart accused of collecting customers' voiceprints https://www.courthousenews.com/walmart-accused-of-collecting-customers-voiceprints/ https://redd.it/1vgjkxj @r_privacy
Apple's ‘Private Relay’ Is Exposing Users’ Real IP Addresses https://www.404media.co/apples-private-relay-is-exposing-users-real-ip-addresses/ https://redd.it/1vgg7wn @r_privacy
Senators Kim, Schiff, Lummis, Barrasso Introduce Bill to Protect Children Online through New Age Reporting Requirements https://www.kim.senate.gov/press_release/senators-kim-schiff-lummis-barrasso-introduce-bill-to-protect-children-online-through-new-age-reporting-requirements/ https://redd.it/1vgfdml @r_privacy
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @r_privacy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,601,898 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“/r/privacy” (@r_privacy), 818 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r_privacy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.