Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@Eomahnter's Ryūkée

@rRyuketsu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003980548379
TypeChannel
Username@rRyuketsu
Description‎ ‌‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‌‎ ‎ ‎ @Eomahnter ― RYUKÉTSU. ‎ ‌‎ ‎ ‎ 🗑. @rRyuketsu ft @archivesoon
Created23 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rRyuketsu

Growth

36 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:323no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:473first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5408893594230623653525.0%
custom 5408943351426745514525.0%
custom 5310021462801806136210.0%
custom 5350817600504883216210.0%
custom 5409108724847513123210.0%
custom 5411154340461179603210.0%
custom 540008203503117659515.00%
custom 540886404485562643615.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 03:25 UTC83 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📲

custom 53508176005048832162custom 53100214628018061361custom 54088935942306236531custom 54089433514267455141

4 Jun 2026, 03:22 UTC84 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Quiet Roads Beneath A Moonless Sky / Every Turn Leads To Another Unwritten Chapter.

4 Jun 2026, 03:21 UTC82 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Signal Pulse ✦ Dark—Light NEXUSLINE @58.9% “غموض” .. ㅤㅤㅤㅤ

4 Jun 2026, 03:18 UTC80 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54088935942306236532custom 53100214628018061361custom 54089433514267455141custom 54091087248475131231

4 Jun 2026, 03:17 UTC50 viewsread 13 August 2026

Steel Horizon “أثر” Cold Structures Against A Sleepless Night / Distant Lights Trace Forgotten Paths Ahead.

4 Jun 2026, 03:12 UTC50 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54088935942306236532custom 54089433514267455142custom 54088640448556264361custom 54091087248475131231

4 Jun 2026, 03:10 UTC42 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ © SHADOW PRINCIPLE Neon Drift ✶ Chaos—Balance BLANKTRACE @71.2% “سراب” .. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

4 Jun 2026, 03:06 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

®

custom 54111543404611796032custom 54000820350311765951custom 54089433514267455141

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @rRyuketsu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 397,271 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@Eomahnter's Ryūkée” (@rRyuketsu), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rRyuketsu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.