Channel
@r3syst
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
5,028subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002201514843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r3syst |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r3syst |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 5,028 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 5,038 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 5,043 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 5,043 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,834 |
| Reactions total | 269 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
269 reactions across 31 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 83 | 30.9% | |
| ❤ | 82 | 30.5% | |
| 🫡 | 26 | 9.67% | |
| 🤣 | 20 | 7.43% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 6.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 4.09% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 3.72% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 3.72% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 3.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇾🇪 Yemeni Armed Forces: With the help of Allah, the Yemeni Armed Forces managed to target Saudi enemy mobilizations, weapons depots, and command headquarters in the Al-Khokha area and the Tadaween camp in Marib province using a large number of ballistic missiles and drones. The strikes were precise, thanks to Allah, and left dozens of dead and wounded, including Saudis. The Armed Forces will continue their operation…
❤7
🇮🇷The spokesperson for the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The U.S. Treasury Secretary boasted of "strangling" Iran through economic sanctions. Beyond the tragic nature of these claims, they represent a blatant demonstration of America's compulsive addiction to sanctions. Whenever Washington proves its inability to pursue diplomacy, it resorts to sanctions; and whenever those sanctions fail to achieve the desir…
❤11
Mohammad Merandi, a strategic affairs expert: Iran is aware that forces from the Trump administration in Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Jordan are preparing for a potential lightning strike – possibly in coordination with Zionist forces – against the Iranian people and the Islamic Republic. Iran is fully prepared to respond swiftly and decisively. @R3SYST
🫡5👌3
🇾🇪 ⚔️ New footage from Yemen's Ansarallah shows drone and ballistic missile launches on July 9, targeting military bases and troop concentrations of Saudi-backed forces in the city of Mocha, southwestern Yemen. @R3SYST
❤9
🏴☠️ ⚔ 🇱🇧 Israeli terrorists continue to shell the Ali al Taher Heights in southern Lebanon. @R3SYST
🤬7
🇾🇪The Yemeni Armed Forces announced a wide-scale military operation targeting Saudi troop mobilizations and weapons depots in Al-Mukhà using ballistic missiles and drones. The operation resulted in precise hits, extensive destruction of equipment, and dozens of casualties, including Saudis, in response to ongoing Saudi attacks and mobilization in the western coast and Taiz governorate. @R3SYST
🔥8
Spanish activist and political analyst Asier Herranz, who was arrested alongside others over allegations of ties to Hezbollah, said the case was politicized from the outset, with information originating from the Israeli Embassy in Madrid and eventually reaching authorities in the Basque Country through local police. Speaking to Al Mayadeen, Herranz described the ordeal as involving "extremely serious accusations," s…
🤬4💯2
🇵🇸 Al-Mayadeen correspondent: Israeli warships opened fire in the sea off the city of Khan Yunis, south of the Gaza Strip. @R3SYST
🤬8
🇮🇶 Strange developments are occurring in Baghdad - all officers and military commanders of the Iraqi army have been called up. Iraqi media reports that leave for the Iraqi army has been cancelled, and military helicopters were flying extensively over Baghdad today. @R3SYST
🤬6
🇵🇸 ⚔️ 🏴☠️ Occupation settlers and soldiers violently attack a Palestinian civilian as they surround and attack people hiding in a mosque east of Idhna, in the occupied West Bank. @R3SYST
🤬15
🤔 🇾🇪 🇾🇪 he Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Sana'a government: "The Security Council is the first to violate the charters and rights it claims to uphold. Saudi money, as usual, buys international favors and undermines the principles upon which those institutions are founded. Does the Security Council know that Saudi warplanes have been violating Yemeni airspace since March 26, 2015, up to the targeting of Sana'a …
💯4
🏴☠️ Moshe Yaalon, former Minister of Defence for the Zionist occupation: "If political considerations didn't exist, we would have ended the Gaza campaign in 2024. But we have Christian groups who threaten to break up the coalition. Political considerations, both in the United States and here, are overriding the essential political-strategic picture. This government is unable and unwilling to end the war. During my…
🤬4🤡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @r3syst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@r3syst edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 169,863 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“R3SYST” (@r3syst), 5,028 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r3syst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.