я приняла решение взять отдых от общения на несколько дней, извините за игнор все кому я должна ответить, я обязательно это сделаю, просто чуть позже
custom 545627971070934919724custom 53687185388633042869custom 53529141501357227886

Channel
@r1scchik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002305538174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r1scchik |
| Description | вместо тысячи слов две тысячи слов |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r1scchik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 104 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 104 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 105 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (11 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,009 |
| Reactions total | 331 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
360 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368718538863304286 | 92 | 25.6% | |
| custom 5195038483843919484 | 64 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5213443724377357332 | 46 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5352914150135722788 | 44 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5456279710709349197 | 39 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5368415520330640285 | 26 | 7.22% | |
| custom 5458502356285027754 | 24 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5368405843769322281 | 14 | 3.89% | |
| custom 5341793788316623193 | 7 | 1.94% | |
| custom 5456218503130392490 | 4 | 1.11% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я приняла решение взять отдых от общения на несколько дней, извините за игнор все кому я должна ответить, я обязательно это сделаю, просто чуть позже
custom 545627971070934919724custom 53687185388633042869custom 53529141501357227886
это получается…19??
custom 521344372437735733231custom 536871853886330428624custom 519503848384391948421custom 53529141501357227882custom 54585023562850277541
я ненавижу тот факт что москва на 80% состоит из лестниц, у меня все
custom 535291415013572278814custom 54562797107093491976custom 51950384838439194844
наставницу ринчан!!!
custom 545850235628502775414custom 53687185388633042866custom 53529141501357227882
если бы в июне мне сказали что я буду не спать до 4 утра а писать с мирой гайд для первашей я бы…..все равно стала наставницей через несколько дней зачисление основного этапа, возьмите меня за руку мне очень страшно
custom 536871853886330428616custom 52134437243773573324custom 53529141501357227884
Posted without readable text
custom 519503848384391948411custom 54585023562850277548custom 53687185388633042866custom 53529141501357227882
стабильно раз в сто лет делаю две красивые фотки которые будут стоять на всех аватарках👀
custom 535291415013572278814custom 521344372437735733211custom 54562797107093491979custom 54585023562850277541
эстетику знаете? я создала почему то когда я снимала это видео я совершенно не подумала о том что запишется еще и музыка💥
custom 536840584376932228110custom 51950384838439194845custom 53684155203306402855custom 53687185388633042862
как только я слышу слова «коллекционировать» и «печать» в одном предложении мне сносит крышу. как и половине жителей петербурга благодаря акции «культурный блокнот» очень забавно ходить по центру и видеть людей с блокнотиками, а приходя во всякие места слышать «вы за печатью?» за сегодня было собрано 20 печатей, но это только начало, на карте отмечено более 200 мест где ставят печати😵💫
custom 519503848384391948413custom 53687185388633042867custom 53684155203306402854
take me home, take me home where i belong
custom 536841552033064028510custom 54562185031303924904custom 51950384838439194843
кто нибудь мне объяснит зачем я выбрала таскать железо вместо того чтобы тусоваться с тетями на групповых?? июль можно описать мемом «сегодня ничего не произошло» поэтому тут слегка пустовато…hope u miss me😳
custom 53687185388633042868custom 51950384838439194845custom 53684058437693222814custom 53684155203306402851
она выложила фотку с парнем и подписала «что может быть лучше?» хз, попробуй поесть малину и крыжовник с куста
custom 536871853886330428614custom 53417937883166231937custom 53684155203306402856custom 51950384838439194842
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @r1scchik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 510,618 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“rschk” (@r1scchik), 104 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r1scchik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.