Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

݃ ׅ 莱斯 . ℜa𝗴ù 🍝 𖥔

@r0aguoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003209501777
TypeChannel
Username@r0aguoi
Description݁ ⌗ 🍝 𝗥A𝗚U — новая кавер группа, с прототuпоm LE SSERAFIM ℕ𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗮 𝔹𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝔸𝗲𝗺i 𝕂𝘀𝘆𝘂 𝕄𝗶𝗻𝗻𝘆𝗲𝗼𝗻 / @ 𝘀pa𝗴het𝘁i ! BOT : @R1gubot ОФОРМА : @madebyavril . 🍜 Own : niche • nisha • blaire
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 23 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/r0aguoi

Growth

297 August 2026 — 29 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:1629no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:3929first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
5
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

444 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54498507416676684117316.4%
custom 51881803101304620895913.3%
custom 57874819648019531735813.1%
custom 51886814254397208885111.5%
custom 51883202831146359744510.1%
custom 5370689026909018935449.91%
custom 5188390449995352117409.01%
custom 5188375426199748219388.56%
custom 5467928503829688020368.11%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 6 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @r0aguoi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 November 2025 to 6 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Dec 2025, 14:16 UTC207 viewsread 11 August 2026

К сожалению у всех участниц нет желания активить в этой группе 💔

23 Nov 2025, 15:25 UTC339 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 54498507416676684117custom 57874819648019531734custom 51886814254397208883custom 51881803101304620892custom 51883754261997482192custom 54679285038296880202custom 53706890269090189351

23 Nov 2025, 15:24 UTC453 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

** ❤️INNYEON «🤩» 𝗬ou don'𝕥 n𝖾𝖾d 𝕥o think too m𝕦ch ( 🍃 )). 🤍🤍🤍 😊r‌‌o‌‌f‌‌i‌‌l‌‌e‌‌ :: 🌟 · . · 𝟎𝟓.𝟎𝟐 *🤩* 🧡 1⃣4⃣ y.o ➖🅐🅖🅢 ::: #MINNYEON #PROFILE #OI ➖ #istp

custom 51886814254397208888custom 54679285038296880206custom 57874819648019531734custom 51881803101304620893custom 51883754261997482193custom 51883904499953521173custom 51883202831146359742

23 Nov 2025, 14:44 UTC254 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 51881803101304620899custom 54498507416676684116custom 51883754261997482195custom 51883202831146359743custom 51883904499953521172custom 53706890269090189352custom 54679285038296880202

23 Nov 2025, 14:44 UTC258 views57 reactions11 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

** ❤️SYU «🤩» 𝗬ou don'𝕥 n𝖾𝖾d 𝕥o think too m𝕦ch ( 🍃 )). 🤍🤍🤍 😊r‌‌o‌‌f‌‌i‌‌l‌‌e‌‌ :: 🌟 · . · 𝟎𝟏.𝟎𝟗 *🤩* 🧡 1⃣6⃣ y.o ➖🅐🅖🅢 ::: #KSYU #PROFILE #OI ➖ #enfp

custom 578748196480195317316custom 54679285038296880209custom 54498507416676684118custom 51883904499953521175custom 51881803101304620894custom 51883202831146359744custom 51886814254397208884custom 53706890269090189354

23 Nov 2025, 14:31 UTC201 views26 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 518832028311463597410custom 51881803101304620897custom 54498507416676684116custom 51883754261997482193

23 Nov 2025, 14:28 UTC235 views57 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

** 🤍EMI «🤩» 𝗬ou don'𝕥 n𝖾𝖾d 𝕥o think too m𝕦ch ( 🍃 )). 🤍🤍🤍 😊r‌‌o‌‌f‌‌i‌‌l‌‌e‌‌ :: 🌟 · . · 𝟑𝟎.𝟎𝟒 *🤩* 🧡 1⃣5⃣ y.o ➖🅐🅖🅢 ::: #AEMI #PROFILE #OI ➖ #estj

custom 578748196480195317316custom 544985074166766841110custom 51883754261997482199custom 51881803101304620894custom 51883904499953521174custom 51886814254397208884custom 53706890269090189354custom 51883202831146359743

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @r0aguoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,249,647 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“݃ ׅ 莱斯 . ℜa𝗴ù 🍝 𖥔” (@r0aguoi), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r0aguoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.