21 Jul 2026, 05:07 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
骗子 ，打了款就删记录跑路，骗了3000U，还在群里活跃 团队名称：数捷广告 骗子联系人： @SWEETBEE01 @LPC008 收款地址：THD5WRbnZTq6D9y5SyiLwqjn4nu1ydr7xn
Channel
投放 上架 开户失信人员及地址曝光|
@qz00z
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,001subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002060672373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qz00z |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qz00z |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 1,001 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 1,003 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 1,007 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 1,010 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,014 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 1,015 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
17 Jun 2026, 01:35 UTC≈1,910 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
名称：蛋蛋三不限源头户商、BGS一刀 用户名: @cc22245 、原ID @mm_zjbcvoD 现ID @BGS_YD （因下午曝光后，此用户名被骗子删除） 骗子地址:TQPZtxqopJnLBWtFHx5FZFtvaqAzQgAqaE 被骗金额：2060 被骗说明: 5月29日自称是户商，主体是武汉中坚，随后开了10个户 ，6月6日打款2060U合作，打完款后，户商告知主体挂了回不来了，给我们退款，退款地址我们也给了，后面在群里、私聊的都不在回复。6月15日对方其中一个号将ID 和名字，头像改了，下午时间又把自己的用户名删除，各大群里都在，大家小心。
👎1
29 Apr 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,340 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
收款地址：TUyunvm8k9dNs51mtSt8KuxB4aLE5Eshfh 避雷垃圾投放，数据乱跑，财务重复打款信息不回，不退款
❤1
2 Feb 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,930 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
曝光该死的骗子！！！大家注意下这个台子 垫资跑的 次日让打款一直联系不上 打电话直接挂掉 骗子id：@yunyunjinhui @dengfe8 🇧🇷 地区：巴西 🎰 产品：电子 PG https://aj-surfpg.com 📊 KPI：kpi15以内达标， 📢 媒体：Facebook kw 💰 预算：KPI 达标可持续申请 🕒 账户时区：-3 kpi达不到按A结算 测试期要求：打首充，每条线200预算 成效10个达标 未达标按8u一个结算 所有合作的次日结算
❤2
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @qz00z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 777,800 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@qz00z named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@yunyunjinhui
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“投放 上架 开户失信人员及地址曝光|” (@qz00z), 1,001 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qz00z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.