Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

情艺女仆馆(大连店)

@qynb666888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,580subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002542658413
TypeChannel
Username@qynb666888
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qynb666888

Growth

2,5722,5802,57612 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 2,572 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:06 — 2,580 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 07:4613 Aug 2026, 04:06
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,571–2,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:062,580+8
12 Aug 2026, 07:462,572first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 2,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
538
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.186%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (18 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total10,217
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
480.0%
👎120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC91 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

营业中🈺 妹妹的大长腿你不想摸一摸吗? 今天在店妹妹8️⃣个➕ 到店就能海选 啥类型都有💃

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC208 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

哥哥们,来溜达一圈不,妹妹都在店呢,到店就海选

👎1

8 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC256 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

♒♒❥. . . . . ❥.....周末愉快💗 💕辛苦一个礼拜,适当放松一下🤩 ​目前有🈳位,🉑预订了、💃

7 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC326 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

哥哥 这个骚不骚 哪位哥哥过来调教一下 这个小妖精太折磨人了🥰

5 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC414 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

哥哥们 你看看这小腰带吓不吓人 哈哈哈哈哈 过来溜达一圈呀哥哥们 在店五位➕🥺

4 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC412 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

📢预约🔥模式🔥开启 📢 一段电影🎞️一个拥抱🎼 ✨所有故事从私影开始 💘 😁预约开始😘 👉有安排请尽早联系我🤳 预约热线https://t.me/sybygmmk

3 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC404 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

#🎈 在岗,敬业中🎈 订🏠趁早 安排最好 锁定快乐🎈🐛感谢推荐❤️💯 ᵀᴴᴱ ᴮᴱˢᵀ ᴵˢ ᶠᴼᴿ ᵞᴼᵁ 期待您的光临[握手]

2 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC429 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎈 在岗,敬业中[啤酒] 顶美都在,预定趁早 安排最好 锁定快乐🎈[發]感谢支持💯 ════请联系我════ 🉑海选🉑预约🉑外派 @qynbd

1 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC401 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

咱家什么类型的都有 到店就海选每天10+个妹妹 过来溜达一圈啊

31 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC634 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

新手玩家最关心的一个问题⤵️ 老拿女仆跟老师比⁉️ 论尺度没有可比性🤕 女仆大多数为在校大学生兼职,一张白纸,没有老练的服务经验,那些你在路上不好意思看的清纯 jk 少女,黑丝大长腿御姐,还有极品萝莉宝宝,在此刻她只属于你,成为你的临时女友,虽然都知道是金钱买来的,但此刻她只属于你,你可以亲可以摸,可以靠自己一步步成功拿下,那种成就感不是直接找老师就有的, 你可以作为她成长路上的开导老师,从一次次亲吻拥抱抚摸,一直到最后一步,甚至有很多得吃的哥哥们,女仆的魅力只有你体验了才会知道,而不是一直空想它有多么的没性价比,那么热门的一个项目经久不衰肯定有它的道理,也不要上来就问加多少钱 95/98。如果是那样的话,那就跟老师没什么两样了,总之泻火找老师,情绪体验找女仆,tg 那么多老师找一个也不是很难,想体验的随时滴滴我❤️❤️ #大连mmk #大连女仆 #辽宁 ✨私聊客服 💟双向限制 🎉聊天大群

1

30 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC424 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

💗还有空位 需要的哥哥快联系我哦 多位可选🌹😛😋 ♥️ @qynbd ♥️ @qynpd_bot

28 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC510 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

天气在变,服务不变 季节在变,态度不变 时代在变,良心不变 不管行业怎么变,我的真诚一直不变 正常🈺业中 已开启预约~

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qynb666888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 327,434 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“情艺女仆馆(大连店)” (@qynb666888), 2,580 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qynb666888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.