Channel
@qy0sh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002593941561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qy0sh |
| Description | Рисую штуки и cök ul fjotcönjonnar по личным вопросас писать @qy0sz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qy0sh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 42 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 42 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 13 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
91 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 57.1% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 22.0% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 12.1% | |
| 🎃 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 4.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qy0sh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2025 to 31 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А лучший способ начать новый год это подвести итоги старого, так что вот мои рисовательные итоги. Не супер много рисовал, но куда больше, чем обычно. Надеюсь, что буду только больше рисовать
❤6💘3
Всех с 2026 годом! Надеюсь уходящий год принёс вам радости и счатья и желаю, чтобы новый год был только лучше! Делитесь как вы уже отпроздновали свой Новый Год, если он у вас уже наступил (что очень вероятно)! P.S. я в реальности ужасно боюсь бенгальских огней, я понимаю, что они в теории безопасные, но всё равно блин огонь же
❤4
рисунки будут, а пока немножко интерактива 👉👈
❤2💘1🥰1
НОВЫЙ КОЛЛАБ ББШ!!! Вот моя работа! Версия без текста в комментариях
❤8🔥4🥰2💘1
DTIYS от Юнини в комментах побольше версий
❤5💘2
все друзья успели пошутить про то что мне пошел третий десяток... чтож вот мне и исполнилось 20 🤯 за этот год я сильно подросла много с кем познакомилась много чего обрела и наконец действительно чувствую себя живой. ппл комьюнити просто воскресило меня как личность за что я всем вам благодарна. поэтому делаю этот день моим признанием в любви этому комунити и всем друзьям которых мы обрели по пути 🥹 ну там по дефо…
❤2💘2
Коллаб ббш! Вот моя часть и пару нефинальных версий обработок
❤8🔥3🎃2💘1
—🎃 Появились тихо — без анонсов, без шума.Там, где свет сливается с тенью, а взгляд — с предчувствием. Просто встали в кадр — и на улице стало чуть темнее, чуть волшебнее.Они — не знаки, а отражение того, как ночь Хэллоуина касается тебя изнутри. И в этот раз ты не наблюдаешь....🧿 ➡️ссылка на диск⬅️ Этот месяц был непростым для многих — усталость, тревога, будни без пауз. Но, может, эта мистическая ночь всё ра…
❤4🎃2🔥2💘1
сыграл в Funeralopolis, ставлю игрушке 10 пикселизированных портретов Jana Pawła II из 10.
❤4🔥4
и вот моя часть поближе
🔥7❤5
🚨 ПОРА ПОРА ПОРА 🚨 НАКОНЕЦ-ТО ВОЗОБНОВЛЯЕМ РАБОТУ Слышите этот нарастающий гул на горизонте? Это не один машинист ведёт наш длиннющий состав. Это ОН — наш главный по креативу — спешит одновременно во всех своих амплуа.🎞️ ➡️ ссылка на диск ⬅️ . . . Уходящее лето... Но мы успели поймать его за руку и впрыгнуть в последний вагон вместе с этим особенным коллабом!🤩 Будем р…
❤1
Ну и с днём рождения..меня🤯 Мне исполняется аж 21 я сама в шоке, ващееее По классике ребятки - лучший подарок для художника это репост его работ 😚 Если вдруг кто-то внезапно захочет поддержать копеечкой то проще будет свистнуть мне в лс - @Sobaka_plaksa что б не оставлять тут свой номер, а то вдруг вы позвонить захотите😳 #щп
❤3🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @qy0sh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,124,917 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qy0sh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“qyosh” (@qy0sh), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qy0sh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.