距离上一次更新有一年了,很荣幸鄙人之前写的和平绘制深受各位的喜爱 🌝 感谢在这一路制作上提供帮助的同伙 由于在这款游戏也开了也些许年了,慢慢的也就失去了击杀敌人所获得的成就感,也就逐渐淡出了这款游戏,更新速度也逐渐更不上版本迭代,最后索性就懒得更新了,如今检测也在日益不断加强,也没有之前的动力继续发电了🤥,当年的一腔热血早已被现实消耗殆尽,空余时间不再想花精力去更新这件“艺术品”了,就此别过吧。
😭9,340🫡1,260❤413🖕237💔77😨38🤩34🏆33
Signed jujiu

Channel
@qxwmqd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121,193subscribers
-535 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001864743145 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qxwmqd |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qxwmqd |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 121,193 | -107 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 121,300 | -71 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 121,371 | -100 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 121,471 | -141 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 121,612 | -113 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 121,725 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 121,728 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 121,728 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65,744 reactions across 19 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27,340 | 41.6% | |
| 😭 | 21,308 | 32.4% | |
| 🤡 | 4,236 | 6.44% | |
| 💩 | 2,182 | 3.32% | |
| ❤ | 1,717 | 2.61% | |
| 🫡 | 1,378 | 2.10% | |
| 🤔 | 1,334 | 2.03% | |
| 🖕 | 1,087 | 1.65% | |
| 🤣 | 773 | 1.18% | |
| 👎 | 653 | 0.993% | |
| 🍌 | 629 | 0.957% | |
| 🤬 | 422 | 0.642% | |
| 👏 | 331 | 0.503% | |
| 🤮 | 239 | 0.364% | |
| 🥰 | 216 | 0.329% | |
| 🌭 | 205 | 0.312% | |
| 🤓 | 199 | 0.303% | |
| 😁 | 160 | 0.243% | |
| 💔 | 123 | 0.187% | |
| 😱 | 114 | 0.173% | |
| 23 further kinds | 1,098 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65,744reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2024 to 25 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
距离上一次更新有一年了,很荣幸鄙人之前写的和平绘制深受各位的喜爱 🌝 感谢在这一路制作上提供帮助的同伙 由于在这款游戏也开了也些许年了,慢慢的也就失去了击杀敌人所获得的成就感,也就逐渐淡出了这款游戏,更新速度也逐渐更不上版本迭代,最后索性就懒得更新了,如今检测也在日益不断加强,也没有之前的动力继续发电了🤥,当年的一腔热血早已被现实消耗殆尽,空余时间不再想花精力去更新这件“艺术品”了,就此别过吧。
😭9,340🫡1,260❤413🖕237💔77😨38🤩34🏆33
Signed jujiu
小迷糊主频道已转让他人,请仔细辨别切莫上当受骗,以后喜欢口嗨骂人到处破别人辅助的小迷糊将不复存在。
👍2,220😭1,620🤡205🖕117👎62🤓52🍌51🕊48
Signed jujiu
好久不见各位挂友们 🌝 我还是不太想更新 不想花时间折磨了
😭4,670👍416🖕415🤡240🤬150👎100❤94🗿44
Signed jujiu
距离我断更之后和平新出了哪些枪械?名字报一下我分别抓一下他们的枪口上抬数据。
👍4,480😭889🍌129👎126❤92👏68🌚55❤🔥46
Signed jujiu
但是安15绘图适配问题我懒得弄,橘子给我那个jni例子编译一次贼慢,不方便随时变更代码编译调试测试,我本来代码就容易写错,每次都是通过编译跑代码看代码写的对不对,一直都是用的晴天大牛帮我编译的纯c绘图插件ta不弄了现在🌝 我单独更新数据兼容最新版本就不适配安卓15了没问题吧?触摸半死问题我也是解决不了的要么就别开了
👍1,820😭528❤141🤡83👎71🍌37💩28🤔21
Signed jujiu
我断更之后内核更新到6.1,现在最高也还是6.1或者6.2以上的也能刷6.1的使用,不需要单独适配更高版本的内核对吧?
👍1,360😭211❤61🤬51🍌47👎37😘26💩23
Signed jujiu
我忘记怎么更新辅助了,而且还得适配安15绘图,还得兼容7.2内核,好麻烦,触摸检测还半死状态,算了不更了 🌝 继续摆烂吧
😭1,940👍105😡87❤55🍌51🖕43👎31🤮18
Signed jujiu
话说现在你们都是怎么翻墙的,用什么机场APP,或者v2节点在哪里买,或者在哪里获取公益订阅地址,我不缺只是好奇 🌝
🤔743😭98👍61❤47🤬44🖕40🌚20👨💻16
Signed jujiu
11.0.1737493474761.v3.exo.mp3
👍765😭622💩103🍌42🫡39👎25🤮21🤔18
Signed jujiu
@全体成员 我海岛航母第一了
👍3,660🤡1,230😭556💩246🫡79❤74🍌68☃61
Signed jujiu
不支持安卓15,切勿购买刚出厂的新机,需要再沉淀沉淀。
👍2,190🤡705😭463🤣176💩131❤74🤔49🙏47
Signed jujiu
雪花测试:2024年10月28日21:10:51
👍1,800😭339🤡268❤104😱83🤮64💩59🍌51
Signed jujiu
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qxwmqd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 836,602 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QX 完美驱动 发布频道” (@qxwmqd), 121,193 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qxwmqd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.