Channel
@qwe187589
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
310subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002467575330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qwe187589 |
| Created | 21 September 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qwe187589 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 310 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 305 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 21 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (21 September 2024 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,369 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2024 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👍写你真实的出击记录👌切勿胡乱诋毁！请用你 捣管 的手速，为老师填写一份报告🫵 自由评论处随意发挥你的文采🤓 本榜单 属（凿友群）所有。 🔻 出击时间:8.29 验证留名:堆堆哥 所在位置：石龙 老师名称：#小柔 老师电报：@qwe0825 上课价格：600 妹子年龄：18 🔻 容貌评分: 9 身材评分： 9 服务评分： 9 环境评分： 9 总结评分（10分制）:9 📝自由评论： 妹子服务很好，不说天花板，情绪价值拉满了，当她脱了衣服的那一刻，我真的都快喷血了， 前凸后翘的，直接上去抱住就是一口，妹子也没有反抗，摸了 一会就开始洗洗，洗的时候妹子就开始挑逗我了，我早已经箭 在弦上。回来床上就开始服务，前面后面照顾的都很全面，尤 其是69的时候，妹妹下面早已经水流成河，我也管不了那么 多，直接推倒就开始进入主 题。这个价位，能找到这种妹子太值了 …
明天正式开课 今天坐车 头晕晕的
石龙了
嘿嘿
【自由评论】 身材很棒，是我的菜，笑起来很可爱长相甜美，预约的开工第一课，昨天就跟老师约好了的，立即就敢过来了到楼下直接上楼的很安全，一进房间屋子里干净卫生跟老师简单的沟通了几句就交了💦费，服务做得很足过程中很用心很仔细得按照课表上的内容都走了一遍，最后女上位，在骚叫中依依不舍中出水。值得推荐，非常不错尤其是老师服务，口技，下次必会在次返食！ 点击进群 https://t.me/saob_i
#南城 小柔 600一 1000二 联系 @qwe0825 频道 https://t.me/qwe187589 双向 @liu0208bot
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
Channel name was changed to «小柔的后花园❤️»
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @qwe187589. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小柔的后花园❤️” (@qwe187589), 310 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qwe187589.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.