Channel
@qw149
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18,118subscribers
+241 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001634740631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qw149 |
| Description | 管理联系： @feiyu199 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qw149 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 18,118 | -21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 18,139 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 18,144 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 18,152 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 18,164 | +287 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 17,877 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,791 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢 😑 N9 国际认证 ｜ 信誉平台 支持5倍验资 【验资:@N9KF】 担保域名:N9.TOP 点击查看 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💝 新会员好礼 注册就送28.8U 新人首存/二存/三存最高赠送8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣U 💝 老会员好礼 电子狂欢每日存款赠送10% 充值笔笔送3%无上限 夜间充值最高可优惠8888U ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 香港六合彩 4️⃣8️⃣.8️⃣ 倍 加拿大28全网返水最高 ⚡️注册网址：N9.PRO 😇🧐🧐😗🧐😙😄 ⚡️ 官方客服： @N9KF ⚡️ 官方飞投： @N9N9 ⚡️ 彩票客服： @N9CP ⚡️ 彩票飞投： @N9N9N9 ⚡️ 福利频道： @N9pd888 ⚡️ 注册网址： N9.COM【USDT】 ⚡️ 注册网址： N9.C…
😔注册即领😇🙃🙃🧐😗🙃🙃 充值礼包 🎰电子 🐠捕鱼 🃏棋牌 🙋🏼♀️真人 ⚽️体育 /场馆齐全 各种出入款方式 🧐😛😕😊😟 😉 支持：😎😀🥰😘😎🥸😒☺️😛 😉😗😇😊🤩😗😟😉😞😊 不限IP，菲律宾、迪拜、柬埔寨随便玩！ 😀实时返水最高享受😗😟😙🤨优惠返点 😀实力大盘，无限代模式 6月18日某集团大佬当天提现58万USDT 7月13日某集团大佬靠实力再次喜提550万USDT 😉东南亚线路： https://174.35.80.6:5029/?id=693057943 😉官方客服： @xpj9085 😉官方频道： @qwbf88 注册即领😇🙃🙃🧐😗🙃🙃充值礼包 😔😟🥺😟😞😔🧐🤓😀🧐🥸😎🥸😎🧐
和“女网友”裸聊几分钟，对方亮出不雅视频连敲14笔，央视披露 #吃瓜 #新闻
女子花两万网购限量款二手包，买回来发现竟是自己半年前丢的！该包一年内被转手5次，警方一查小偷竟是“亲闺蜜”。 #吃瓜 #新闻
男子推拿时录下技师“不当行为”，警方已介入调查 #吃瓜 #新闻
#享受跳舞带来的乐趣 #时尚穿搭 #大学生穿搭 #性感女神
近日，四川。老婆发现老公给她的备注是英文名，没想到连起来读竟是… #吃瓜 #新闻
男子网购3万假币 因太假花不掉 竟拍视频炫富 直接炫进监狱 一审被判处有期徒刑一年三个月 并处3万元罚金 #炫富 #网购
上海饭店，抽象这一块，价格这一块 #上海 #物价 #吃瓜
为求永生曾和亲儿子换血，美国亿万富豪又克隆“婴儿版自己”，他认为自己“将不会死”，回应“克隆自己”争议：我没有创造胚胎，只是逆转了细胞年龄 #吃瓜 #万万想不到
世界小姐“雅典娜”确认遇害，细节公开：被闺蜜骗去菲律宾，绑匪收到80万美元赎金仍将其杀害，该案主犯刘某文已被遣返回国
8月3日， #罗正否认2023年存款有1900多万 ：当年账户仅有13739元，解约金361万，其中200万经纪人垫付，今年才还清，从未刻意卖惨，已委托律师取证维权。 #罗正晒银行流水
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @qw149. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,106,427 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“奇闻百科猎奇吃瓜搞笑” (@qw149), 18,118 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qw149.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.