🍭 #Git工具 #AI自动化 #开发者工具 🏵 GitX - AI驱动的Git自动化管理工具 🍥 简介: GitX 是一款便携式 AI 代理组件,专门用于优化代码版本控制流程。它能够自动化生成标准化的 Git 提交信息、执行规范的标签分支创建,并确保代码在 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor 等兼容代理环境间进行安全的数据推送与同步,显著提升代码库的管理效率与合规性。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目

Channel
趣猫🐱
@qumao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,526subscribers
+142 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001646497750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qumao |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qumao |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 6,526 | +44 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 6,482 | +47 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 6,435 | +32 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 6,403 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 6,388 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 6,384 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.74%
- avg views ÷ 6,526 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 244
- 44 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.296%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 44
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,749 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🍭 #AI工具 #设计工具 🏵 Logocreator - 开源AI логотип生成器 🍥 简介: 该项目是一款基于开源技术构建的logo生成工具。用户通过模块化交互方式,自由选择组件并进行样式配置。系统支持灵活的自定义设置,能够根据特定设计需求快速构建并输出图形标识。该工具逻辑清晰,提供完整源代码,适用于开发人员进行二次开发或集成应用。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #OCR识别 #文档转换 #API开发 🏵 Text-extract-api - 高精度多格式文档OCR识别 🍥 简介: 该工具基于FastAPI构建,支持将图片、PDF及Office文档高效转换为Markdown或JSON格式。系统集成Celery实现任务异步处理,利用Redis进行OCR结果缓存,确保在处理复杂表格、数值及数学公式时具备极高的识别准确度与响应速度。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #后端开发 #开源框架 #API服务 🏵 Appwrite - 开源后端服务开发平台 🍥 简介: Appwrite 是一套开源的后端即服务(BaaS)解决方案。该平台通过提供统一的 API 接口,集成数据存储管理、用户身份验证及权限控制等核心功能。开发者可利用其预构建的后端架构,简化服务器端开发流程,实现应用数据的快速部署与管理,有效提升跨平台应用的开发效率。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #计算机科学 #编程学习 #教育资源 🏵 Computer Science - 全英文计算机科学课程合集 🍥 简介: 该项目汇集了全面的计算机科学领域基础课程资源。内容涵盖程序设计语言的核心运作机制、系统架构设计原理以及相关技术领域的进阶知识。此合集旨在为学习者提供系统化的学科理论支撑与技术知识路径,适合希望深入理解软件开发底层逻辑的开发者及计算机专业人员进行系统性学习。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #低级设计 #系统架构 #面试准备 🏵 Awesome Low Level Design - LLD及面向对象设计学习资源库 🍥 简介: 该项目汇集了针对低级设计(LLD)与面向对象设计(OOD)的系统性学习资源。内容涵盖面向对象编程基础、设计模式、UML建模及并发编程技术,并提供了一系列面试常见问题的解答与案例解析。该资源旨在辅助开发者构建稳健的软件架构,提升代码设计能力,并作为求职面试的技术准备参考资料。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #开源软件 #音乐播放器 🏵 Ya-music-desktop - Yandex Music桌面客户端 🍥 简介: 本程序为Yandex Music平台的开源桌面端客户端,采用Electron技术开发。软件完整还原了Web端的功能体验,并针对本地操作进行了优化。核心亮点在于内置了音频下载功能,支持用户将音乐资源直接保存至本地设备。该工具通过API对接官方服务,确保音频流媒体播放的稳定性,同时提供轻量级的操作界面,满足桌面端用户对音乐存储与离线播放的需求。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #安全监控 #GRC #漏洞管理 #漏洞扫描 🏵 Shok-monitor - 无代理的SOC与GRC安全监控平台 🍥 简介: Shok-monitor 是一款基于 SSH 协议的无代理安全运营中心(SOC)与治理、风险与合规(GRC)平台。该系统支持对 39 种不同类型的数据库进行集中监控,具备自动化漏洞分析与威胁情报处理能力,旨在通过轻量化架构实现合规性检查与资产安全监测,有效提升企业环境内的安全审计效率。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #网络安全 #蜜罐技术 🏵 Dragon Vector Honeypot - 多协议诱饵攻击分析系统 🍥 简介: 该系统是一款多语言蜜罐程序,通过实时诱捕机制吸引攻击者。系统可在攻击触达瞬间进行流量分类与威胁评估,并自动对识别出的恶意源执行隔离操作。该工具旨在通过实时响应机制,提升网络防御体系在应对入侵威胁时的自动化处理效率,适用于构建高交互式防御环境,实现对威胁源的精准追踪与即时阻断。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #加密货币 #开源钱包 #隐私安全 🏵 Umbrella Wallet - 去中心化匿名加密钱包 🍥 简介: Umbrella Wallet 是一款主打隐私保护的去中心化加密资产管理工具。该程序采用非托管架构,完全由用户自主掌控私钥。系统不强制要求账户注册、邮箱绑定、手机号码验证及 KYC 实名认证,确保用户在使用过程中的操作匿名性与资产安全性,完全符合去中心化金融的运行逻辑。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
🍭 #自动化 #人工智能 #桌面工具 🏵 HeyAgent - 本地桌面端AI自动化代理 🍥 简介: HeyAgent 是一款基于本地运行的桌面自动化代理工具。该程序具备屏幕读取与文件管理能力,可自动执行启动应用程序、操作浏览器及创建 Google Workspace 文档等任务。通过集成 Telegram 机器人接口,用户能够远程向该代理发送指令,实现对桌面端的远程控制与交互操作。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
❤1
🍭 #开源软件 #录屏工具 #游戏辅助 🏵 Captail - 游戏高光时刻自动捕获程序 🍥 简介: Captail 是一款开源的 Windows 屏幕录制工具,旨在提供 NVIDIA ShadowPlay 的替代方案。该程序支持通过热键保存游戏运行的即时片段。其核心优势在于高可靠性设计,具备录制状态实时监测机制,能够在游戏进程、视频采集或显卡驱动异常时自动尝试恢复录制,确保录制任务的稳定性与连续性。 🎈 【进入项目】 🗣 活动线报 | 掘金项目
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @qumao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,101,836 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“趣猫🐱” (@qumao), 6,526 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qumao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.