Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
🪽
@quietheavenn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003029232626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quietheavenn |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quietheavenn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 1 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1081.8%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10.8
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.50%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 119 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☃ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@lNatsuki kalo boleh jujur nih ya, aku kira kamu orang yg kalem loh ya 😹✌️ ternyata ngga. actually your usn attracted me once karna keliatan kayak aktivis gitu and you seem pretty nice + friendly. i would love or maybe really love to interact more with you!
@dollayble salfok bngt sama kakak ini, soalnya cantik bngt ga boong. your account is really elegant and simple for me and i like it so much, you really have positive vibes and really chill. i hope we can interact more!!! 🥰🥰
@MydeiH kurang tau soalnya aku blum masuk chp nya juga 🥺🥺 but i seen you everywhere, like literally everywhere. theme nya juga jujur bagus, aku suka themenya and you seem nice. i would love to interact with you
@respehct respect sama usn nya, keren jujur. kayaknya chp nya suka kadang rame deh, suka interact juga ya? i like your vibes btw, it's like you're giving a positive vibes to the other. kurang tau karna kita blum interact banyak, so i hope we can interact more yaa 😌
@shiyahn you seem kinda intimidating at first, makin lama deket makin kayak bocah. akun yayah bagus banget, usn nya juga, chp nya juga bagus tapi minusnya suka ganti ganti muka. inimah udah jadi my rumah home aku jir 😹✌️
☃1
@xcherie huft orang ini mulu... kamu literally ada dimana mana, anw usn kamu cakep banget ga boong and you seem very friendly. drop dead gorgeous banget akunnya kenapa?? positive vibes juga damn, tapi kita kurang deket. maybe we should interact more 😌
☃1
@sNatsuki i don't really know you cuz aku blum masuk chp dia 😭 but your usn caught my attention, like really really caught my attention. i've seen you everywhere, ig...?? you look stunning btw, we should interact more
@wailst you seem pretty chill dan ga banyak ngomong gitu, jujurly akunnya udah kayak itunya daddy corbuzier (hitam putih) banget tuh. kinda intimidating for me, but i think you also have a soft side. let's interact more?
@ayngeI ini kayaknya beneran angel, you look stunning and your usn was really really pretty, just like you. aku suka bngt sama usn kamu pls and you seem really nice + fun to interact with, so i hope we can interact more 😭
☃1
@kaiserz you're usn caught my attention, aku kira kamu tipe orang yg serem gitu kalo di deketin tapi kayaknya ngga and your account is also very nice and cool. aku kurang kenal, maybe we should interact more?
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @quietheavenn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🪽” (@quietheavenn), 1 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quietheavenn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.