Vogelfrei durch EU-Recht? Dr. Ulrich Vosgerau über den Kollaps des deutschen Rechtsschutzes https://www.tichyseinblick.de/video/kommentar/vogelfrei-durch-eu-recht-dr-ulrich-vosgerau-ueber-den-kollaps-des-deutschen-rechtsschutzes/ Der Rechtsstaat erodiert vor unseren Augen. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht gibt seine Rolle als Hüter der Freiheit auf und beugt sich dem politischen Elitenkonsens sowie dem Druck aus Brüssel…

Channel
DRESDEN Ω inBEWEGUNG
@querdenken_351
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,303subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001296085567 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @querdenken_351 |
| Created | 19 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/querdenken_351 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 2,303 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 2,307 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 2,308 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 2,308 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 31.8%
- avg views ÷ 2,303 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 731
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,824 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 56s
- Average length
- 1m 19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Das Ende der Privatsphäre: Deutschlands neue Überwachungs-Agenda https://youtu.be/Co9rts0FmX4?si=_TbvXD8iMxfFRey7
Na, auch nochmal kurz Urlaub gemacht? Bevor es pünktlich vor den Wahlen los geht? Mit dem Spannungsfall.
Biontech verliert vor Gericht Das Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg verwirft die Berufung der BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH als unzulässig. Damit wird das Teilurteil des Landgerichts Aurich rechtskräftig. https://x.com/anwaltulbrich/status/2084464609918898533?s=46
Warum holen wir immer noch so viele Muslime ins Land? Ganz einfach, weil sich auf diese Weise die linken Parteien weiter am Trog unserer Steuern bedienen können.
Du kommst von Arbeit nach Hause und stehst vor deinem eigenen Haus vor verschlossenen Türen, weil dein Haus in der Zwischenzeit besetzt wurde. Du rufst die Polizei die erklärt dir, dass du den Zaun nicht berühren darfst, weil du dann verhaftet wirst. Stattdessen sollst du die Kosten, die die Besetzer verursachen übernehmen, das Haus bezahlen, den Strom bezahlen das Wasser bezahlen das Essen zahlen. Heute in Spanien m…
Invasion: Knapp 50.000 Menschen überrollen binnen 24 Stunden Ceuta https://www.tichyseinblick.de/kolumnen/aus-aller-welt/marokko-ceuta-europa/ Ceuta ist gefallen. Es genügte eine endlos große Menschenmasse, die über die Küste und durch die Grenzanlagen auf spanisches Hoheitsgebiet drängte und die Grenzen überrollte. Die spanischen Sicherheitskräfte wurden überrannt. Was als Zustrom von 1.500 illegalen Eindringlingen…
EU und NATO wollen uns glauben machen der Russe plane eine Invasion, während die wahre Invasion längst unter unseren Augen stattfindet.
Das kann nur böse enden. Sánchez: „Die Einwanderer, die nach Ceuta kommen, sind Frauen und Kinder, von denen viele unterernährt sind“
Migranten überrennen spanische Hafenstadt https://x.com/alice_weidel/status/2082820857248858583?s=46 Auslöser des Ansturms ist eine Entscheidung von Spaniens Oberstem Gerichtshof. Demnach dürfen Migranten, die schwimmend spanischesGebiet erreichen, nicht mehr ohne Einzelfallprüfung sofort nach Marokko zurückgeschickt werden. Seitdem kommen Migranten zu Tausenden über das Wasser. Ceutas Regierungschef Juan Jesús Viva…
Die Physik der leeren Gasrohre: Was uns im Winter droht https://ansage.org/die-physik-der-leeren-gasrohre-was-uns-im-winter-droht/ Etwas Gruseln gefällig? Nach Wochen des kollektiven Wegsehens und immer neuen Säuen, die durchs mediale Dorf getrieben werden, lohnt sich mitten im Hochsommer ein unbarmherziger Blick auf die nackten Daten des deutschen Gasnetzes. Die Sonne brennt, die Heizungen ruhen, und im Berliner …
Kanton Zug gibt Bürgern ihr Steuergeld zurück https://www.tichyseinblick.de/wirtschaft/schweiz-kanton-zug-steuern-buerger/ Der Schweizer Kanton Zug nimmt Jahr für Jahr mehr Geld ein, als er ausgibt. Künftig sollen die Bürger indirekt Geld zurück bekommen. Auch andere Kantone diskutieren ähnliche Modelle. Gäben deutsche Städte und Gemeinden Haushaltsüberschüsse – so vorhanden – ebenfalls an die Steuerzahler zurück? …
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @querdenken_351. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 378,241 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DRESDEN Ω inBEWEGUNG” (@querdenken_351), 2,303 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/querdenken_351.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.