5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 273–316 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 23:34
302
-4
23 Aug 2026, 22:37
306
-5
15 Aug 2026, 19:14
311
+33
8 Aug 2026, 08:34
278
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:37
278
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 302 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
30.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
14 (21 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
55
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
225 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5305707065073765737
45
20.0%
custom 5305623686873652501
43
19.1%
custom 5305545866361213892
39
17.3%
custom 5305393085784560879
28
12.4%
custom 5305510561730041260
25
11.1%
custom 5305699514521262830
19
8.44%
custom 5305697740699769004
15
6.67%
custom 5305264326959994976
11
4.89%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 14 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @queencubes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
дорогие, на украшения – стоп 👋
упаковываю вещи к переезду, и все бусины уже в коробке с остальными колодами, камнями и кубиками
кто ждет отправки – теперь после 11-го августа, а если вы в Москве – там же и отдам ❤️
без изменений беру только на астрокубики, оставила один наборчик, чтоб кинуть в сумку 🙏
📕🩸 | Диагностика негатива – анализ происходящего в вашей жизни и поиск причин негатива, который мог скопиться в вашем поле – как магический, так и бытовой.
В рамках данной работы я использую чакральные кубики (таро&астро&чакры&стихии), а также колоду Елены Лес «Таро Магии»🃏, она отлично показывает первопричины негатива, или же (чего я всем желаю) отсутствие на Вас деструктивных воздействий
Когда расклад нужен?
Хо…
важное для клиентов 😕
я в строю и снова с вами, чтоб не писать каждому одно и тоже: ответы по кубикам сегодня, отправки по украшениям - уже завтра ❤️ если я не читаю ваш диалог - я не хочу его потерять)) такое уже было, что чаты улетали в архив ! 😠, поэтому вечером все ждем меня!)
ребята, очень извиняюсь что я сегодня не на связи, но в силу самочувствия сил на разбросы нет весь день. вижу ваши смс, надеюсь завтра мне будет лучше и я всем все отдам 🙏🫂
КАРТИНКА-ЖЕЛАНИЕ НА АВГУСТ 🕊
Перед вами различное множество обоев для телефона с цветами, которые будут помогать нам в августе достигать целей. Тк был отдельный запрос на денежные, подобрала красивые в обоих цветах))
— Можно наделить любые из них намерением и установить к себе на экран телефона 🎀
Для «усиления» каждому желающему могу рассчитать Ваш финансовый код, и его также можно будет написать прямо на обоях. Н…
РОДОВЫЕ ПРОГРАММЫ В ВАШЕЙ НК 💃
Замечали семьи, где из поколения в поколение все становятся врачами? Или женщины постоянно разводятся? Или мужчины теряют бизнес? Это не всегда просто совпадение. В астрологии есть понятие родовых программ.
Иногда в натальных картах родителей и детей повторяются одни и те же аспекты. Это значит, что определенная тема может передаваться по роду. Например, у мамы сложные отношения с муж…
на самом деле из-за этого фактора я тревожусь достаточно долго, моментами даже хочется бросить всё это блогерство, и работать исключительно по сарафанке, но я люблю делиться знаниями! на своем примере - я тоже немногословна у коллег, но так или иначе стараюсь поддерживать некоторые посты.
я не прошу вытягивать из себя слова, хочу чтобы каждый комментарий был искренним, но боже, как я устала о них напоминать 💔
приме…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @queencubes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DARM1 | ЭТО НЕ СЛУЧАЙНО” (@queencubes), 302 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/queencubes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.