رابط مكتبة اختصارات القدرات 🔥 https://qudurat.com/library

Channel
قدرات ثانوي - اختصارات القدرات
@qudratshortcuts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,187subscribers
-792 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001651020780 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qudratshortcuts |
| Description | حابدأ معاك القدرات من لفل 1️⃣ واعطيك الاختصارات ⚡️ لدرجة تخصص احلامك 🎯 جبت ٩٧ من اول محاولة 🏆 ساعدت ١,٨ مليون شخص 💌 سجل معايا 👇🏻 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qudratshortcuts |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 14:15 | 52,187 | -1,068 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 53,255 | -162 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 53,417 | -158 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 53,575 | -135 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 53,710 | +879 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 52,831 | +294 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 52,537 | +609 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 51,928 | +33 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 51,895 | +41 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:24 | 51,854 | +94 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:46 | 51,760 | +212 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 51,548 | +375 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 51,173 | +49 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 51,124 | -60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 51,184 | -81 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 51,265 | -131 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 51,396 | -194 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 51,590 | -242 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 51,832 | -191 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 52,023 | first reading |
Engagement
197 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.15%
- avg views ÷ 52,187 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,730
- 86 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.518%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 87
- of 197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 197 (29 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 320,899 |
| Reactions total | 1,640 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,040
- Videos
- ≈1,780
- Links
- ≈1,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 34m
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 112 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,160 reactions across 186 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,544 | 37.1% | |
| 🔥 | 830 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 264 | 6.35% | |
| 👏 | 208 | 5.00% | |
| 🤣 | 171 | 4.11% | |
| 🤔 | 150 | 3.61% | |
| 💔 | 126 | 3.03% | |
| 😭 | 111 | 2.67% | |
| 🎉 | 70 | 1.68% | |
| 🤯 | 70 | 1.68% | |
| 🤓 | 65 | 1.56% | |
| 😢 | 61 | 1.47% | |
| 🤷♀ | 57 | 1.37% | |
| 🥱 | 56 | 1.35% | |
| 😁 | 40 | 0.962% | |
| 😨 | 33 | 0.793% | |
| 😴 | 33 | 0.793% | |
| 🤡 | 32 | 0.769% | |
| 🙉 | 29 | 0.697% | |
| 😐 | 28 | 0.673% | |
| 30 further kinds | 182 | 4.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 191 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
شارك الاختصار مع أصحابك 💛
👍2
📍إذا تبغى تفتك من التشتت وتمشي على خطة توصلك لـ +90.. حمل نسختك المجانية 💸 من هنا: qudurat.com/roadmap
سوي 🔥 إذا عرفت الاجابة
🔥16☃2❤1
سوي 👌🏻 إذا تعرف الاجابة
👌10🥴2🤔1
⛔️ لسه تحفظ التجميعات؟ أكبر خدعة في القدرات إن حفظ الأسئلة مذاكرة 🤯 التجميعات انقرضت.. ليش؟ لأن بنك قياس فيه آلاف الأسئلة.. ويتحدث باستمرار 🔄 فالسؤال اللي حفظته ممكن ما حيجيك أصلاً والسؤال اللي يجيك ممكن يكون جديد عليك 🧠 الحفظ يعلمك جواب سؤال واحد بس.. لكن الاختصار ⚡️ يعلمك تحل كل الأسئلة اللي من نفس النوع حتى لو أول مرة تشوفها فعليك تمشي على ٣ خطوات 👇🏻 1️⃣ التأسيس بالاختصارات 📚 ضروري تعرف اختصارات حل الأسئ…
❤3
اوجد وحدة القياس د م أ
- أ. ١٢٠55%
- ب. ٦٠31%
- ج. ٨٠8%
- د. ١٦٠6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔10❤9👍1
#تحدي_الهندسة 📐
سوي 😂 اذا كنت تعرف الاجابة
🤣84😭16🤔4🌚3🥱2❤1
سؤال الاغلبية يجاوبوه غلط بالقدرات 😎
❤9🤯4😭1
اختصار مجموع الاعداد باختبار القدرات 🤓
❤7👏3
#تحدي_إكمال_الجمل ✍🏻 لكي تكون قائدًا مميزًا، لا _____ الآخرين.
- أ. تقلد80%
- ب. تسامح3%
- ج. تنصح3%
- د. تعاتب14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @qudratshortcuts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 34 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اوجد وحدة القياس د م أ
- أ. ١٢٠55%
- ب. ٦٠31%
- ج. ٨٠8%
- د. ١٦٠6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#تحدي_إكمال_الجمل ✍🏻 لكي تكون قائدًا مميزًا، لا _____ الآخرين.
- أ. تقلد80%
- ب. تسامح3%
- ج. تنصح3%
- د. تعاتب14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#تحدي_الحساب 🧮 اشترت فتاة فستان بـ ٧٠٠ ريال بخصم ٣٠٪، كم كان سعر الفستان قبل الخصم؟
- أ. ٧٣٠29%
- ب. ١٠٠٠50%
- ج. ١٠٣٠14%
- د. ١٣٠٠7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#تحدي_التناظر_اللفظي ⚖️ يرجع : يرتد
- أ. يتهور : يسرع35%
- ب. يزرع : يبذر18%
- ج. ينحف : يقل24%
- د. ينأي : يبتعد23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#تحدي_الإحصاء 📊 يقدم مطعم ٤ أنواع من الشوربة ٥ أنواع من السلطة ٦ أنواع من اللحوم، بكم طريقة تستطيع تكوين طبق به كل المكونات؟
- أ. ١٢٠64%
- ب. ٢٤20%
- ج. ١٠٠9%
- د. ٨٠6%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#تحدي_الكلمة_المختلفة ☝🏻 أي من الآتي مختلف:
- أ. هضاب11%
- ب. أنهار50%
- ج. سواحل20%
- د. جبال19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hjjhhhjjnkkjhgg1234 · 382,907#1
@news_ejaza · 354,833#2
@H100_OnTop · 1,525#3
@onlytheshe23 · 3,659#4
@quaran_3 · 10,872#5
@balaldszs · 4,901#6
@sotooracademy · 99,647#7
@Amirah941 · 3,832#8
@vip_qustion · 332,826#9
@k727xd · 88,867#10
@qudraat_m · 32,361#11
@aseaf1989 · 48,386#12
@AlrabehAcademy · 3,529#13
@Challengeforest · 7,815#14
@Ceptxq2 · 5,002#15
@MahmoudMonsef · 293,353#16
@qdratmalmk · 270#17
@ttdpse · 75,243#18
@aallaallaallaall9 · 5,895#19
@almajd_g3 · 4,046#20
@TOPGT6 · 3,078#21
@gmot59 · 6,783#22
@cit223 · 14,889#23
@NEWTON4477 · 3,131#24
@omygn1 · 12,652#25
@loloxxiop · 10,293#26
@M9BA7Q3 · 83,638#27
@School1TR · 34,302#28
@MezlaQ · 127,399#29
@qudrat_free · 280,186#30
@noonksa · 30,216#31
@tvtc_g_jazan · 2,351#32
@tahsili16 · 4,044#33
@QirnasEdu · 94,034#34
@ne_wb · 117,359#35
@deen090 · 442#36
@thwahaj · 800 (as read 24 August 2026)#37
@quwahaj · 1,769#38
@zohal_Qquestions · 5,056#39
@Ghazi_Algosaibi · 1,714#40
@Iilivn · 825#41
@Sadikatalkutub · 1,774#42
@MezlaQ4 · 129,752#43
@tphysics1 · 9,099#44
@saudijobscom · 172,686#45
@ksaaic · 42,294#46
@xgogo_99x · 3,459#47
@notmic1 · 14,387#48
@kkksiii · 35,920#49
@TOPGT5 · 5,453#50
@skkkrw · 1,458#51
@ricjff · 195#52
@talagarfaisa30_l · 549#53
@RR10090 · 856#54
@rioane · 315#55
@muhanna_5 · 34,293#56
@yyjkyy · 1,980#57
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MezlaQ4 · 129,752
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
@noonksa · 30,216
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
@sotooracademy · 99,647
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026
@ne_wb · 117,359
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@QirnasEdu · 94,034
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قدرات ثانوي - اختصارات القدرات” (@qudratshortcuts), 52,187 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qudratshortcuts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.