Channel
@quayslab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001710448274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quayslab |
| Description | ❄️ Wake up and cook up! 🧊 Calling gems from the bando🚀 these are high risk degen calls, could send or fly to 0. #NFA #DYOR Can help with CG/CMC/Trending/CEX/Anything you need Rip Takeoff🙏 @superlinguini Disucssion Channel: https://t.me/QuaysBand |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 19 December 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quayslab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 50 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 50 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2022 to 16 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aped Ninja Alien, looks good moon or dust 35kmc https://dexspy.io/eth/token/0xc81ba17522dd2542e8683ef27f675ae6ed9d0e97 Twitter: https://twitter.com/NinjaAlienETH Website: https://www.ninja-alien.com/ Telegram: https://t.me/ninjaalien
❤1
3x 🤟
aped $GAZUA 50k mc https://dexspy.io/eth/token/0x024cb03bd8f4e5b7583b8eaabbc861eee9eba5b9 https://t.me/gazuaERC
aped the dip here https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xade3a9fadbd47bd40e437684cfa320091beb7df5 80k mc https://t.me/WSBPORTAL
took a gamble here moon or rug https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x8bd15ce3f6dfb6aa0f28ee635c0bdbbb636706a7 https://t.me/HaikuInuEth
Ngmi in this market
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xbfe3aa51ea36de36cbd5d8016034efab0f6d9485 moon or dust 15k mc @aishibaerc
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xf8ad4b923dc20d7fc853a6db514e0addc83cf999 Lets try this one 35k mc
👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
4x
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xB149fc240F5b3361Bc3653936850A674d1f02896 Aped this no idea what it is but yolo moon or rug 50k mc
2.5x maybe a slow mooner. Way more x's if you waited for a dip
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quayslab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,101,026 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quays lab 💎” (@quayslab), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quayslab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.