Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for реzт мастер красовак

Channel

реzт мастер красовак

@quaydie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

162subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003875541377
TypeChannel
Username@quaydie
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 28 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/quaydie

Growth

159162160.59 August 2026 — 159 subscribers10 August 2026 — 160 subscribers17 August 2026 — 162 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159–162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:28162+2
10 Aug 2026, 21:58160+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:02159first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
129.7%
avg views ÷ 162 subscribers
Avg views / post
210
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 May 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,261
Reactions total212
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

845 reactions across 19 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22126.2%
🌭14116.7%
custom 5208654324741211065708.28%
custom 5471901915514150951536.27%
custom 5472173464821439380364.26%
custom 5206581702373183218333.91%
custom 5400140347802160526333.91%
👾333.91%
custom 5244533098552507382313.67%
custom 5307500175265127397303.55%
custom 5089147542629778272293.43%
🕊252.96%
custom 5471960790925844833212.49%
🥰172.01%
custom 5242556146581009536131.54%
custom 5199552275428697295111.30%
custom 5467401738975730665101.18%
custom 525154792690316425680.947%
custom 594737703452200861860.71%
custom 533504506325477266950.592%
8 further kinds192.25%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 845reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
107
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 19 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
67
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @quaydie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC58 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 508914754262977827214custom 520658170237318321810🕊5custom 54610331056346563922🌭1👻1

27 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC204 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

закреп старый не менялся квейд квед ковид эвейд кьяд кьюд квевд эни прнс мне 13 . рисую все и везде тт твит анон инфо тлгф . буzzт https://t.me/boost/quaydie . щитпост https://t.me/+zQj37CuTZhMyOWNi

custom 508914754262977827211🌭3custom 53170248923092486933custom 52065817023731832182

27 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC191 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 520658170237318321821custom 546740173897573066510🌭6custom 50891475426297782724custom 52086543247412110652custom 54610331056346563922🕊1custom 53170248923092486931

22 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC281 views38 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ветеринарная клиника бегите от аномалий ветеринарня клиника крадет ваш рассудок

23🌭7🕊6👾1custom 54001403478021605261

21 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC256 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

напишите кого нарисовать только не дуо и не пейринги умоляю у меня оуки чешутся артблок

🌭12💔21

21 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC271 views60 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

флюксион скеч

custom 54719019155141509513013custom 520865432474121106513🌭1👾1custom 53075001752651273971custom 59473770345220086181

14 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTCviews —10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

7🌭2custom 52445330985525073821

14 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC420 views56 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

светлые цвета это не для меня

23custom 520865432474121106512custom 519955227542869729510custom 54719019155141509514🌭2🍾1👾1custom 52445330985525073821

12 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC624 views82 reactions6 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

привет 👍 приве👋

custom 547217346482143938035custom 547190191551415095119🥰15custom 594737703452200861853custom 52086543247412110653🌭1👾1

10 Jul 2026, 21:46 UTC585 views54 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

спок

28🌭12🕊8custom 53075001752651273972👾1custom 52086543247412110651custom 52445330985525073821custom 54427634056791671961

8 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC434 views42 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ариана обернись там что то сзади

20🌭10custom 53075001752651273978🍾1👾1custom 52086543247412110651custom 52445330985525073821

25 Jun 2026, 16:42 UTC523 views52 reactions67 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 524453309855250738225🌭97custom 52086543247412110653custom 54001403478021605263🕊2custom 53075001752651273972👾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @quaydie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 577,898 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“реzт мастер красовак” (@quaydie), 162 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quaydie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.