Всем привет, друзья! 👋 Сегодня я поиграл в акиру, но не закрыл ни одной галки, но зато поставил 40-73% и 62-100х3 за сегодня! Достаточно неплохо, надеюсь завтра получится галочку закрыть. 🤞

Channel
Здесь живёт свинтус по имени QuAre_15
@quare_150
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
24subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002021723393 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quare_150 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quare_150 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 24 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 26 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 166.7%
- avg views ÷ 24 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 40.0
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (29 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 30s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Всем привет друзья! 👋 Сегодня я не играл в акиру, завтра отыграю сессию.
AKIRA 7/14 стадий. 💬 Наконец-то я прошел акиру в два рана! Также наконец-то у меня появился консистент на ласт вейве, надеюсь конс продолжит фармиться и скоро будут раны большие раны до ста. Перейдем к статистике. 📊 Статистика: Количество попыток: 2213 Лучший ран до ста: 40-100% Лучший ран по моему мнению: 25-70% Лучший ран с нуля: 41%. #akira
Кстати, спасибо вам за преодоление порога в 25 подписчиков! ❤️
AKIRA 40-100%!!! 💬 Добрый вечер, аудитория! Я опять обновил свой бест ран до ста. Как вы думаете, на каком стейдже я впервые дойду до ласт парта? 🧐
Всем привет, аудитория! 👋 Сегодня я не играл в акиру, извините :(
AKIRA 25-70% 💬 Закрыл еще одну галочку и на самом деле было не так сложно, но все равно ран крутой. 👍
AKIRA 47-100%! 💬 У меня кажись начинает появляться консистент на ласт вейве, данное событие очень сильно радует меня! Ушло у меня 794 попытки и потратил 1 час на ран. 👍
Клип на 35%
AKIRA 6/14 стадий. 💬 Наконец-то я закрыл 5-ую стадию данного уровня. Я уже максимально приблизился к тому что я закрою лвл в два рана! Я рад что мне стало ментально чуть лучше и надеюсь все также будет улучшаться. В общем, перехожу к статистике. 📊 Статистика: Количество попыток: 3140 Лучший ран до ста: 55-100% Лучший ран по моему мнению: 34-82% Лучший ран с нуля: 35%. #akira
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEURMKgWDes
BRUTAL 100%! 💬 Я прошел свой 29 экстрим демон и что я хочу сказать насчет уровня: 1. Уровень очень фановый и я поставлю ему энджоймент 8/10. Самый сложный парт наверное будут прыжки перед дропом потому что я сдыхал на них очень часто. 2. Экспириенс выдался у меня на 10/10 ведь я флюкнул уровень с 64%. Перейдем к статистике по уровню. 📊Статистика: Количество попыток: 2121; Бест ран перед комплишном: 38-100х2.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @quare_150. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Здесь живёт свинтус по имени QuAre_15” (@quare_150), 24 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quare_150.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.