Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Quant X Tribe (Next Level)

Channel

Quant X Tribe (Next Level)

@quantxnextlevel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,753subscribers

-154 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001186991977
TypeChannel
Username@quantxnextlevel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/quantxnextlevel

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,74514,91414,829.57 August 2026 — 14,907 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,907 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,914 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,911 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,904 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,883 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,872 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,869 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,864 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,872 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,858 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,850 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,849 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,843 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,847 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,850 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,836 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,812 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,814 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,815 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,809 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,813 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,807 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,806 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,805 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,804 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,800 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,748 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,751 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,748 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,745 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,753 subscribers14,7537 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,720–14,939 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:4114,753+8
15 Sept 2026, 17:5814,745-3
13 Sept 2026, 22:4014,748-3
12 Sept 2026, 02:3614,751+3
9 Sept 2026, 19:1714,748-52
6 Sept 2026, 11:5714,800-4
4 Sept 2026, 01:5814,804-1
2 Sept 2026, 19:0614,805-1
1 Sept 2026, 18:2214,806-1
31 Aug 2026, 15:5414,807-6
30 Aug 2026, 13:5714,813+4
28 Aug 2026, 19:3714,809-6
27 Aug 2026, 18:4714,815+1
26 Aug 2026, 19:3214,814+2
25 Aug 2026, 18:2314,812-24
24 Aug 2026, 20:3414,836-14
23 Aug 2026, 03:3314,850+3
21 Aug 2026, 18:1714,847+4
20 Aug 2026, 16:5214,843-6
19 Aug 2026, 20:2214,849first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 42 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

372 reactions across 33 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14037.6%
❤12834.4%
👍9024.2%
👏143.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 372 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,800 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Here is the recording https://youtu.be/wCoSoxcn6Uo

👏13❤2

25 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 3 September 2026

🙏 Thank you, Quant X Tribe! Here's what we covered in tonight's session: 📉 The "Index Effect" is dead. Alpha decay killed it, the market now front-runs S&P 500 additions, and added stocks are often already held by mid-cap ETFs. ⚖️ Pension fund rebalancing is a live opportunity. Rigid 60/40 mandates create forced, predictable trades, and funds won't change them even knowing the market watches. 🌪 The strategy thriv…

25 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,350 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

What is your key takeaway from this Session?

❤7👍6🔥2

25 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

We've started tonight's session! Those who aren't in yet can join here in this link: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/38ALHhhCT6yYsh3TLRcvJA

25 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC≈1,610 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

31.9% during market crash - The W.B.S (Whale Blind Spot) Strategy Tonight @ 7:30pm Attend to get the strategy walk through and script~ https://zoom.us/meeting/register/38ALHhhCT6yYsh3TLRcvJA Gimme a 🔥 if you wanna acquire this strategy that is profiting now ~

🔥27

24 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC≈1,770 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Hey Quant X Tribe 👋 What if you knew exactly what some of the largest institutions in the market are positioning to buy next week? 🏦 How would that change the way you trade? 🤔 There's a blind spot in the market that most retail traders never see. 👁 This week, we're revealing the No. 1 strategy behind it. 🎯 🗓 Tues, 25 Aug 🕢 7:30pm 📍 Zoom link drops here tomorrow See you there 🚀 React 🔥 if you're joining us on T…

🔥38❤2

20 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,380 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📊 The number you trust most is only half true. Everyone watches volume. But volume resets to zero every session. It tells you something happened, not whether it stuck. Open interest is the number that answers that. Except close to two thirds of SPX options volume now expires the same day it trades, so open interest never records it. Inside: Why the VIX at its 2026 low disagrees with the options chain The two-numbe…

❤4

19 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈2,240 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨 THE VIX ISN'T TELLING YOU THE WHOLE STORY 📉 VIX just printed 14. Lowest reading of 2026. Markets look dead calm. 🔍 But contracts expiring 26 to 29 August are pricing a premium over every other date on the board. That premium never shows up on the VIX, because the VIX is one number averaged across the whole market. It only shows up once you check date by date. 🗓️ That window isn't random Nvidia earnings drop 26 Au…

❤5🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC≈2,650 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Hope you’re having a lovely Saturday, Tribe! ☀️ ⚠️ Heads up! There are accounts on Telegram impersonating us. 🚨We do not contact our tribe members over private chat. Stay sharp out there and let’s keep growing together as a Tribe💙📈

👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @quantxnextlevel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@quantxnextlevel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTCAnonymous Poll195 voters

Do you think Bitcoin has bottomed?

  1. Yes, I think so📉22%
  2. No, I think there is more downside 📊50%
  3. I’m not sure… that’s why I’m tuning in tonight! 🙋‍♀️🙋28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTCAnonymous Poll123 voters

Are you attending tomorrow’s session?

  1. I’ll be there! 🙋🙋‍♀️59%
  2. Setting the reminder now ⏰30%
  3. I can’t make it for this one 😔22%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

Which of these would you want to test?

  1. 🌎Exchange premiums and venue-level pricing24%
  2. ⛓️‍💥 On-chain flows and wallet data34%
  3. 💰 Funding rates and derivatives positioning39%
  4. 📊 Sentiment and crowd indicators59%

The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Piranha Profits™ Online Trading School
@piranhaprofits · 22,868
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
SGX Invest
@sgxinvest · 25,177
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quant X Tribe (Next Level)” (@quantxnextlevel), 14,753 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quantxnextlevel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.