Channel
@quantum_space
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,488subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001194314746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quantum_space |
| Description | Always been fascinated by quantum physics and the possibility of alternate realities. Discussion: t.me/schrodinger_box Discord: discord.gg/w5PPkgga6U ClubHouse: clubhouse.com/club/quantum-physics |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 24 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quantum_space |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 7,488 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2021's Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics It was a big year. Fermilab discovered possible evidence of new physics with the muon G-2 experiment. Physicists created a time crystal, a new phase of matter that appears to violate one of nature’s most cherished laws. And we got a glimpse of an enormous pair of bubbles towering over the Milky Way. © Quanta Magazine
Signed Keshav Space
Is Time Fundamental and Space just an Illusion? - Fotini Markopoulou "How deep goes time? Is time bedrock reality, part of the fundamental fabric of reality? Or is time an emergent thing, generated by deeper truths of existence? What is the place of time in deep physical laws like relativity and quantum mechanics? Can we get to the bottom of time? Fotini Goes on to explain how space is just an emergent property and …
Signed Keshav Space
Is the Cosmos a Computer? - Leonard Susskind "That the cosmos is a computer sounds like a modern metaphor, a way of explaining how things work. But some make a bolder claim: that the cosmos is, in reality, a computer, not just as a metaphor. This would mean that all that exists in the physical universe is in essence the computational process of the universe itself generating itself. Does that make sense?" Host: Rob…
Signed Keshav Space
Join our Discord Server for discussion and hangouts: https://discord.gg/w5PPkgga6U
Signed Keshav Space
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Keshav Space
Why Did Our Universe Begin? Sir Roger Penrose brings about the uncanny similarity between the Universe just before the Big Bang and the Universe after the death of the last black hole. He goes on to make the case that "the Gravitational impression observed in the microwave background radiation could, in fact, be the gravitational fingerprint of dying black holes". Host: Robert Lawrence Kuhn © Closer To Truth
Signed 11D Space
General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists by M.P. Hobson, G.P. Efstathiou, and A.N. Lasenby Book provides a clear mathematical introduction to Einstein's theory of general relativity. It presents a wide range of applications of the theory, concentrating on its physical consequences. After reviewing the basic concepts, the authors present a clear and intuitive discussion of the mathematical background, inc…
Signed 11D Space
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 11D Space
50 Physics Ideas You Really Need to Know by Joanne Baker In this book, Joanne Baker unravels the complexities of 20th-century scientific theory for a general readership. She explains ideas at the cutting-edge of scientific inquiry, making them comprehensible and accessible to the layperson.
Signed 11D Space
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 11D Space
How to Teach Quantum Physics to Your Dog by Chad Orzel When Quantum Physics expert Dr. Chad Orzel went to adopt a dog he never imagined he would end up with one as inquisitive as Emmy. Could she use quantum tunneling to get through the neighbor's fence and chase bunnies? What about quantum teleportation to catch squirrels before they climb out of reach? In this witty and informative book, Orzel and Emmy - the talkin…
Signed 11D Space
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 11D Space
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quantum_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should we host discussion on Clubhouse.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2021 to 26 December 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
@quantum_space named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quantum Mechanics” (@quantum_space), 7,488 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quantum_space.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.