Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Quant King

@quantKing0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,803subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001293221799
TypeChannel
Username@quantKing0
Description☑️ Quant & Reasoning for SSC exams YouTube channel link : https://youtube.com/channel/UCK9PzX9GnLy83YM0I-f9ZvQ #SSC #SSC_CGL #SSC_CHSL #SSC_CPO #CGL_MAINS
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/quantKing0

Growth

21,80321,85721,8307 August 2026 — 21,857 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,850 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,839 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,815 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,808 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,803 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,795–21,865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5421,803-5
11 Aug 2026, 18:2821,808-7
10 Aug 2026, 19:1721,815-12
9 Aug 2026, 19:2221,827-12
8 Aug 2026, 19:2421,839-11
7 Aug 2026, 18:3221,850-7
7 Aug 2026, 03:1621,857first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
988
Videos
241
Links
962

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

868 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥37743.4%
20323.4%
👻12614.5%
👏546.22%
🥰505.76%
🙏485.53%
🤝60.691%
😎40.461%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 868reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2025 to 9 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2025, 15:14 UTC≈33,800 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#SSC_CGL_2025 Notification Out..!! 🔥 Total Vacancies : 14582 Crucial Date : 01.08.2025 Tier 1 : 13 August Tier 2 : December 2025

🥰4921🔥7

Signed Abhinav

31 Mar 2025, 14:40 UTC≈37,200 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @RBE_SPhoto

Be ready for tomorrow’s Twitter campaign. 1 April (10 AM) #SSCReforms2025 #SSC_जवाब_दो 🤝🔥 @RBE_S

🔥42👻97

Signed A

20 Mar 2025, 17:17 UTC≈35,100 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/_GQXXBJqBO4

👏26🤝43😎2

Signed A

18 Mar 2025, 13:35 UTC≈37,800 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026

2023 m case hua bcz shi bonus nhi diya.. aur 2024 m 10+9 = 19 Questions m bonus de diya is dar se ki court case na ho 😂

👻100🔥195🤝2

Signed A

18 Mar 2025, 13:33 UTC≈35,900 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Worst ever Answer key in the history of SSC CGL! Another court case loading!

🔥140🙏1411

Signed A

17 Mar 2025, 08:10 UTC≈30,200 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/Abhinav42029661/status/1901546572132810878

🔥15

Signed A

16 Mar 2025, 17:58 UTC≈20,400 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThePundits_OfficialPhoto

Use Hashtag: #SSC_RELEASE_CGL2024_FINALANSKEY @ThePundits_Official.

🔥22👻174😎2

Signed A

14 Mar 2025, 18:11 UTC≈23,500 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Drop all the Proofs of Scam in SSC CGL 2024 FINAL RESULT below, in comments to this post.

🔥59

Signed A

14 Mar 2025, 18:09 UTC≈24,700 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

If the answer keys of CGL MAINS 2024 are not released by Monday, a Twitter campaign will be launched to publish final answer key and marks. Hasgtag - #SSC_RELEASE_CGL2024_FINALANSKEY Monday (11 AM)

🔥55

Signed A

13 Mar 2025, 15:37 UTC≈27,600 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/MAo-Cwp0MNg?si=F1aKyruELzlC_vzd

16🙏4

Signed A

13 Mar 2025, 06:07 UTC≈18,800 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

318 UR selected 315 UR selected 322 UR Not selected 325 UR not selected etc etc.... Possible reasons for this: - 1. Section Wise Normalisation. Those people who had scored lesser marks in section-1 (150-160 around) but had higher in Section-2, might had suffered loss in section-1 normalisation, as we have seen that when paper is easy, normalisation can become negative too. When everyone is getting 160+ in section

63👏7🔥1

Signed Abhinav

12 Mar 2025, 20:59 UTC≈19,000 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏21🔥5🙏21🥰1

Signed लंकापति दशानन रावण लंकेश 2.0

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quantKing0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 956,047 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quant King” (@quantKing0), 21,803 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quantKing0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.