Channel
@quanminfz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
204subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002121689807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quanminfz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 11 February 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quanminfz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 204 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 205 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 205 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 206 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 57.1% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2024 to 7 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最近假押 横空出世 大家有没有被下面的假押骗过 假押是什么意思 就是假的担保负责人 配合公群老板 一起骗做单小弟 币安假押避雷 @cppdd 万泰假押避雷 @pill @RIOT @SLAY @STAB 新博假押避雷 @MENU @RATE @BIDS 索隆假押避雷 @sold 华侨假押避雷 @hqdb 太子假押避雷 @cost @SONG @SELL 青花瓷假押避雷 @qhcdb @face 我非常痛恨假押 以上都是假押的ID
👍1
全面反诈骗子曝光频道 pinned «所谓的比特担保已改名非凡担保！是个假压，遇到这个担保直接退群不交易！ 避雷 @item»
全面反诈骗子曝光频道 pinned Deleted message
全面反诈骗子曝光频道 pinned Deleted message
全面反诈骗子曝光频道 pinned Deleted message
很多话在这里说不方便 来下方交流群！投稿私信来这里！ https://t.me/+W46EbXOaw3hmN2Vl
交流群免费送红牛！私我免费送 @fanzhatougao
❤1👍1
所谓的比特担保已改名非凡担保！是个假压，遇到这个担保直接退群不交易！ 避雷 @item
👍2
全面反诈骗子曝光频道 pinned «曝光骗子！投稿发布联系»
曝光骗子！投稿发布联系
@YYZ00703， ，骗子id
😁1
最近大家都注意一下这个比特担保，这个里面没一个是真的。好像是团伙作案。一开始说是有料子的。然后做完他也不给我回款。后面的话消息都是已读不回。大家都提防一下这个比特担保。
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @quanminfz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@quanminfz named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全面反诈骗子曝光频道” (@quanminfz), 204 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quanminfz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.