Прошла эпоха Кто лил мотив на финки, знают XPartners и насколько это была мощная ПП. Но к сожалению проект сообщил о закрытии.
🤔3🤯2

Channel
@qualified_lead
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,909subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001586570452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qualified_lead |
| Description | 💸 Affiliate, трафик через видео, органика. Приватка — https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=sorP Связь — @dmarkov |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qualified_lead |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 6,909 | +18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 6,891 | +15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 6,876 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,743 |
| Reactions total | 303 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
303 reactions across 26 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 112 | 37.0% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 13.5% | |
| 💯 | 40 | 13.2% | |
| 🗿 | 35 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 10.9% | |
| 🤔 | 24 | 7.92% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 3.63% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.32% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.66% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qualified_lead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Прошла эпоха Кто лил мотив на финки, знают XPartners и насколько это была мощная ПП. Но к сожалению проект сообщил о закрытии.
🤔3🤯2
YouTube в два раза поднимет цену входа в монетизацию С 1 февраля 2027 года новым каналам для рекламной монетизации понадобится 8 000 часов просмотра за год или 20 млн квалифицированных просмотров Shorts за 90 дней. Сейчас порог вдвое ниже: 4 000 часов или 10 млн Shorts-просмотров. У действующих участников YPP вход не пересматривают. Но для Shorts вводят отдельное условие: если канал не держит 10 млн квалифицирован…
🤔1
Мой друг заработал 2,268,790.73 рублей с этого канала.... А сегодня он покажет разбор таких же похожих ниш И пошагово как он вывел канал на 2.2к$ за 30 дней Рекомендую тоже подписаться Выстроил сеть каналов на 800.000.000 млн просмотров в 20 лет гарантированные ниши в 2026 / что делать если канал начинает падать Ссылка ещё актуальна, рекомендую подписаться https://t.me/+RZoFI91nwQQ4YzRi https://t.me/+RZoFI91nwQ…
🗿7✍2❤2🔥2🤔1
Банворды ТикТока Если упомянете их в описании, платформа заблокирует ролик, а аккаунт выбьет из рекомендаций. Список банвордов: 1win, букмекерская компания, онлайн-казино, казино, выигрыш, азарт, лотерея, риск, гемблинг, беттинг, беттинговая индустрия, ставки, азартные игры, развлечение, онлайн-развлечение, игорный бизнес, спортивные ставки, сотрудничество, возможность, предложение, прибыль, заработок, деньги, дох…
❤10✍4
🛍 50.000 аккаунтов instagram отлито клиентами с нашего сервиса Magosapp менее чем за месяц! Мы выпустил первый сервис для работы с instagram на ios запросах на рынке! Полная эмуляция айфононов на уровне сети для instagram, для того что бы работать с сотнями тысяч аккаунтов одновременно, больше не нужны фермы из iphone! Наш сервис способен массово выполнять следующие действия: • Регистрация аккаунтов instagram • Вы…
❤9🔥5👍4
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4✍2🔥2
32 источника бесплатного трафика Новое видео на YouTube — Тикток — Ручной коментинг — Пинтерест — Ютуб — ВК Клипы — Дзен — Дорвеи — Форумы — Threads — Маркетплейсы цифровых товаров — Инстаграм — Вконтакте — ВК Видео — похожие каналы — похожие никнеймы — X (ex-Twitter) — SEO-статьи — взаимопиар — розыгрыши — email-рассылки — Google Discovery — упоминание в историях — инвайтинг — Одноклассники — Массреактинг — Массл…
❤8👍3🔥2
Оплаты — боль 2026 года То карта не подходит, то банк не грузит. Есть сервисы для создания виртуальных карт, но выпуск карты стоит дороже, чем оплата подписки. Нашел крутой сервис по картам от LuckyCards, там вы сможете юзать их под что угодно: как для рекламных кабинетов Facebook/Google/TikTok, так и оплачивать разные подписки. Самый топ, что здесь нет скрытых платежей. Полные $0 за всё: 0% за обслуживание карт, …
❤4👍1
Редкий случай, когда я на стороне Артемия Лебедева: если у тебя есть мозги и интернет, ты можешь зарабатывать сидя в любой дыре. Всем поддерживающим автора видео: в интернете границы устанавливают только мозги и желание работать, у лузера всегда миллион оправданий.
💯15👏2🗿2
Ссылки из видео: 🔗 Промпт для генерации текста без следов ИИ — ссылка 🔗 Зарубежная карта Zarub — ссылка 🔗 PPL VPN (7 дней бесплатного доступа) — ссылка 🔗 NeoVPN (7 дней бесплатного доступа) — ссылка
👍4
Выучи Claude на 96% за 12 минут Новое видео на YouTube - бесплатная или платная версия? - перенос данных из chatGPT - какую верию Claude выбрать? - подключение к сервисам - создание проектов - расширение для Google Chrome - Claude Cowork - созание промптов для других нейросетей - артефакты - Claude skills 📱 Смотреть новое видео (пролистай поиск и найди видео) Приятного просмотра
🔥4❤1
Дуров* наконец-то высказался по поводу удаления Telegram из App Store — как вы можете знать, сегодня мессенджер на несколько часов пропал из магазина Apple. По его словам, один пользователь спрятал запрещённый контент в старом сообщении публичной группы, а затем пожаловался напрямую Apple. Так работают вымогатели: требуют деньги у владельцев сообществ, а при отказе пытаются добиться их блокировки. Дуров* отдельно п…
🤔11❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @qualified_lead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Главный по трафику” (@qualified_lead), 6,909 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qualified_lead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.