Channel
@qtdjbg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004318569292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qtdjbg |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qtdjbg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 49 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 48 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 43 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 35 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 35 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (28 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 135 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#网友投稿 先款跑路狗，说联通转码可以发，然后私信他，说前面可以先款测包 ，后期上量可以预付，我今天就丢了两包测包给他 给他打了1326U，打过去之后，就直接消失失联 本人几乎从不先款，但是从跟他沟通的感觉很像是以前合作过的老机房小号或者是一起的，所以才会先款测试，想不到还是大意中招了，现在行情不好奉劝各个盘口不要先款合作，先款=骗子 骗子ID @xxjj56 骗子 地址 TJ44YPo9V5k9ciRgR1dHtWFA8ZAkcrQdcE 关联地址 THehVJDQ7aWqvkBdTv9pZEgWU5Dky5U6t4 TYJ4qx7WKopJYz35sAfa7zXSkm6gA4jsYb TTvNjNS1ZBqqqqLJidx96ck3eu59asQ9HR ——————————————————————— 🤬🤤😍😭 乾通乘风起，盛景入新章 诚收：虚卡实卡三网机房，源头106，直播棋牌优质数据 cpa cpc cpt等各路引…
#网友投稿 ⚠️行业避雷公告（请各盘口、机房注意） 跑路🐶飞机 @baoj83847（昵称：宝剑） @weiwei8377（昵称：虎虎生威） 上述两个账号为同一人操作， 对外自称机房和盘口。 事情经过 合作前，对方要求先支付预付款。 最初沟通约定预付 10000U 即可安排发包，我方按照约定支付了 10000U。 付款后，对方又临时提出需要继续追加预付款，否则无法安排发包。我方提出可先按照已支付的金额安排部分业务，剩余款项待业务正常落地后立即补齐尾款，但对方拒绝，坚持要求继续追加预付款。随后双方沟通退款，对方表示可以退款，我方第一时间提供了退款地址。然而自此之后，对方不再回复消息，也未按约退款。 目前了解还收割了其他盘口5000u，还有机房也被收割，这种性质恶劣行业败类，人人得而诛之！ 涉及金额 累计打款：22287U 跑路金额：11276U 就是这种狗垃圾，导致整个短信市场乌烟瘴气。 跑路狗地址： TFuW6mSJdR…
#网友投稿 @cuicui8801此人上来就要测5W 我给了 然后过了几个小时说数据还好 然后说拉群第二天结账 又问我拿了20W条实时数据 反手就把我拉黑了 敬告同行还有各位机房106通道 锤@cuicui8801永恒@lllllll886 花海@Rs1666777 啊皮@ap0002 和 猫@cat335577 都是1980.vip 1980.top 1980.am 金沙国际 0022.vip 0022.tw 威尼斯人曝光是一起的跑路狗 ——————————————————————— 🤬🤤😍😭 乾通乘风起，盛景入新章 诚收：虚卡实卡三网机房，源头106，直播棋牌优质数据 cpa cpc cpt等各路引流模式，欢迎前来共商大业 意见投诉反馈： @hydt737 乾通娱乐交流： @QIANT…
#网友投稿 帮我曝光一个骗子 @tangtangtang2 这是他的飞机号 冒充一手机房 这是他的收款地址 TL6mTSov8N9KurwXHbs2RNDGXDZ3Zpyy2q ——————————————————————— 🤬🤤😍😭 乾通乘风起，盛景入新章 诚收：虚卡实卡三网机房，源头106，直播棋牌优质数据 cpa cpc cpt等各路引流模式，欢迎前来共商大业 意见投诉反馈： @hydt737 乾通娱乐交流： @QIANTUGROUP 乾通信誉频道： @cygj5688 乾通打假曝光： @qtdjbg 乾通集团官网： http://8899.app
狗刷子，刷两个充值100输完后就不上线，下注手法都一样，2个充值号码都是一个地区，刷水你都刷不明白 色量避雷狗刷子： @ioonq @djdjdjdjfjwn 集团对狗刷子采取零容忍 不予结算 曝光处理 ——————————————————————— 🤬🤤😍😭 乾通乘风起，盛景入新章 诚收：虚卡实卡三网机房，源头106，直播棋牌优质数据 cpa cpc cpt等各路引流模式，欢迎前来共商大业 意见投诉反馈： @hydt737 乾通娱乐交流： @QIANTUGROUP 乾通信誉频道： @cygj5688 乾通打假曝光： @qtdjbg 乾通集团官网： http://8899.app
#网友投稿 曝光底下的小弟，全部上水，小几十个充值都没一个充值在包里，说了还不承认理直气壮的，甚至连电话号码都没有绑，绑定电话的没一个在包的，各位机房盘口看清楚这种小人，也是真心喂了狗，这种人就是该死的 ——————————————————————— 🤬🤤😍😭 乾通乘风起，盛景入新章 诚收：虚卡实卡三网机房，源头106，直播棋牌优质数据 cpa cpc cpt等各路引流模式，欢迎前来共商大业 意见投诉反馈： @hydt737 乾通娱乐交流： @QIANTUGROUP 乾通信誉频道： @cygj5688 乾通打假曝光： @qtdjbg 乾通集团官网： http://8899.app
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @qtdjbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 229,432 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qtdjbg named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“乾通集团打假曝光” (@qtdjbg), 49 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qtdjbg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.