Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

球圣体育官方包赔

@qstyvip888

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,051subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003269182734
TypeChannel
Username@qstyvip888
Description更多精彩内容👇 🧧官方福利 @qsty3116 🏆官方包赔 @qstyvip888 🤝合作联系 @qsvip777 👙内涵吃瓜 @qschigua666 🇭🇰🇲🇴六合心水 @qslhc ⚽️体育推单 @qsty3116001 🎮电竞推单 @qsdj1234 ✈️TG飞投 @QS678Bot 德甲|法甲|英超 |西甲|意甲
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qstyvip888

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@qsty3116/148378 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC@qstyvip888/1026 · this entry8 Jun 2026, 13:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@qsty3116/1483911 Jun 2026, 16:47 UTC@qstyvip888/1027 · this entry11 Jun 2026, 16:49 UTC1.0072 seconds
@qsty3116/1484522 Jun 2026, 18:13 UTC@qstyvip888/1030 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 18:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@qsty3116/148492 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC@qstyvip888/1031 · this entry2 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC1.00under a minute
@qsty3116/148502 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC@qstyvip888/1032 · this entry2 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC1.00under a minute
@qsty3116/1485324 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC@qstyvip888/1034 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@qsty31168 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@qsty3116 (71)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @qsty3116. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,0516,0856,0687 August 2026 — 6,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,083 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,051 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,046–6,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:516,051-32
8 Aug 2026, 02:146,083-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:466,085first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.567%
avg views ÷ 6,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
504
Videos
28
Links
68

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🏆 熬过风浪,方显本色! 选择【球圣体育】,见证品牌的力量! 在风云变幻的市场中,只有真正的强者才能屹立不倒。 从2018年到2026年,我们一路披荆斩棘: ⚡️ 2018年 熬过柬埔寨818风暴 🛡 2019年 扛过全球新冠疫情 ⚔️ 2023年 经历缅甸大清扫 💥 2024年 挺过菲律宾大清扫 🏔 2025年 跨越金三角大清扫 🛡 2026年 历经柬埔寨再清扫 历经八年洗礼,无数平台轰然倒塌,而我们依然挺立! 为什么选择我们? 🔒 老品牌:岁月沉淀,值得信赖。 💪 够硬核:大风大浪见证风控与运营的极致实力。 🤝 有保障:相信品牌的力量,给您最稳固的后盾。 如此硬核的平台,你绝不能错过! 🌐 立即认准官方唯一通道: qs6801.com

26 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC44 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ================== 足球 让球 中国超级联赛 成都蓉城 v 北京国安 成都蓉城 -0 / 0.5 @ 0.85 ================ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 跟着感觉走,别墅看大海!! 💎不中包赔30% 100起 30%包赔护航,敢买就敢赔 公平公正 百万u担保 可查可验 零审核 秒出款 实力信誉老站 致富专线 qs6801.com 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 上分验资,一对一聊天软件: 🤩下载心舟不迷路 xz555.com 心舟专员红单

24 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC49 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏀 与球圣体育强强联手 · 赢在起点 🏆 📢 好消息 球圣体育诚招诚信代理加盟!与体彩店联合发起! 在这里,我们用精确的数据、优质的产品,为你搭建最稳固的财富桥梁! 🔥 核心优势,不容错过: 超高回报:独家尊享 55% 的超高返佣比例! 强大后台:系统稳定高效,数据透明,管理轻松无忧。 专业支持:提供精细化数据支撑,助你轻松拓展市场。 迈出这一步,携手共赢,共创辉煌未来! 📲 立即咨询,开启财富之门: Telegram 官方客服:@qstyh

6 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC103 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ================== 足球 大 / 小 世界杯2026(美加墨) 葡萄牙 v 西班牙 西班牙-0.5 ================ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 跟着感觉走,别墅看大海!! 💎不中包赔30% 100起 30%包赔护航,敢买就敢赔 公平公正 百万u担保 可查可验 零审核 秒出款 实力信誉老站 致富专线 qs6801.com 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 上分验资,一对一聊天软件: 🤩下载心舟不迷路 xz555.com 心舟专员红单

2 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC74 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ================== 足球 让球 世界杯2026(美加墨) 葡萄牙 v 克罗地亚 葡萄牙 -0.5 / 1 ================ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 跟着感觉走,别墅看大海!! 💎不中包赔30% 100起 30%包赔护航,敢买就敢赔 公平公正 百万u担保 可查可验 零审核 秒出款 实力信誉老站 致富专线 qs6801.com 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 上分验资,一对一聊天软件: 🤩下载心舟不迷路 xz555.com 心舟专员红单

2 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ================== 世界杯2026(美加墨) 西班牙v奥地利 足球 大 / 小 大 2.5 / 3 ================ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 跟着感觉走,别墅看大海!! 💎不中包赔30% 100起 30%包赔护航,敢买就敢赔 公平公正 百万u担保 可查可验 零审核 秒出款 实力信誉老站 致富专线 qs6801.com 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 上分验资,一对一聊天软件: 🤩下载心舟不迷路 xz555.com 心舟专员红单

22 Jun 2026, 18:13 UTC53 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❤️香港28❤️ 世界杯 红单推荐 ================== 世界杯2026(美加墨) 阿根廷v奥地利 足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (1 - 0) 大 2 / 2.5 ================ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 跟着感觉走,别墅看大海!! 💎不中包赔30% 100起 30%包赔护航,敢买就敢赔 公平公正 百万u担保 可查可验 零审核 秒出款 实力信誉老站 致富专线 hk666888.com 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 上分验资,一对一聊天软件: 🤩下载心舟不迷路 xz555.com 心舟专员

16 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTC49 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

猜中一场是运气,一路猜中才是硬实力! 赶快加入我们吧! 2026世界杯热血开战中, 我们正在寻找迈巴赫680的车主!

13 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC41 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

兄弟们,重注单来了,假如你有10,000块可以下注7000元全场瑞士-1.5/2,3000元瑞士-2,大胆下

11 Jun 2026, 16:49 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩助力世界杯⚽️ 一首场亏损包赔•你的亏损球圣/香港买单一 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 首场赛事亏损1000以上 即可申请返还本金,最高100%包赔 一活动规则 一 🤩🤩仅限「2026世界杯」首场 墨西哥VS南非 💎赠送的彩金需3倍流水,即可提现; ⚠️禁同ip 同设备 多账号套利或其他非法手段参与,否则将取消活动资格; 🤩🤩🤩🤩 @qstyh @qstyi @xg28app 🤩🤩🤩🤩 qs5500.com xg9930.com 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 📍 很简单!你有资源就开条代理线 客户输100万自己到手55万人民币+ 📍注册代理账号(点我) #球圣体育 #体育玩法 #球圣体育 #比分教学 #香港28

8 Jun 2026, 13:50 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😆 最后 3 天,全球心跳同步,绿茵战火一触即发。 🔥 美加墨启幕,三国共举,巅峰盛宴即刻点燃! 😀 冠军之路,星光汇聚,谁将在此加冕为王? 🙃 悬念拉满,每一球都是生死搏杀,每一秒都是高能瞬间。 🌐 极致狂欢,世界瞩目,只为此刻。 🧐 尽在 球圣体育,锁定赛程,与我们共赴这场四年一度的足球信仰!

22 Apr 2026, 10:12 UTC158 viewsread 12 August 2026

为回馈新老客户,球圣体育限时推出 NBA季后赛包赔单 4月23日 NBA 9:30 🔥队伍:俄克拉荷马雷霆 VS 菲尼克斯太阳🔥 推荐:俄克拉荷马雷霆 -17.5 ❤️❤️❤️ 全员均可参与! 不中包赔下注金额30% ; 下注1000起,最高10000; 30%包赔护航,敢买就敢赔! 投注有保障,30%包赔给你底气! 下注后请联系心舟专员:QS6666 进行登记 截止时间:2026年4月23日上午9:00

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qstyvip888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 962,294 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“球圣体育官方包赔” (@qstyvip888), 6,051 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qstyvip888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.