Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,681. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,441–16,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:41
14,693
-50
16 Sept 2026, 04:36
14,743
-84
14 Sept 2026, 08:56
14,827
-33
12 Sept 2026, 21:19
14,860
-44
11 Sept 2026, 01:40
14,904
-57
8 Sept 2026, 01:21
14,961
-89
4 Sept 2026, 19:36
15,050
-75
3 Sept 2026, 02:14
15,125
-52
1 Sept 2026, 22:47
15,177
-46
31 Aug 2026, 20:45
15,223
-38
30 Aug 2026, 19:55
15,261
-39
29 Aug 2026, 19:06
15,300
-50
28 Aug 2026, 20:55
15,350
+8
27 Aug 2026, 22:24
15,342
-22
26 Aug 2026, 22:55
15,364
-20
25 Aug 2026, 22:54
15,384
-36
25 Aug 2026, 02:03
15,420
-53
23 Aug 2026, 12:45
15,473
-64
21 Aug 2026, 23:26
15,537
-44
20 Aug 2026, 15:12
15,581
first reading
Engagement
174 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.99%
avg views ÷ 14,693 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.311%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 174 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
174 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
50,452
Reactions total
122
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 26m
Average length
2m 24s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
662 reactions across 126 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
285
43.1%
👍
240
36.3%
👏
85
12.8%
🔥
36
5.44%
🤔
4
0.604%
🥰
3
0.453%
🏆
2
0.302%
👌
2
0.302%
❤🔥
1
0.151%
💯
1
0.151%
😁
1
0.151%
😍
1
0.151%
😐
1
0.151%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 662 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Viloyat va tuman hokimlari shtablar faoliyatini samarali tashkil etib, yangi imkoniyatlardan to‘liq foydalanishi shartligi ta’kidlandi.
Ular sentabr-dekabr oylarida 350 ming odamni doimiy ishga joylashtirish va yana 1 million aholining daromadini ko‘paytirish majburiyatini oladi.
Shuningdek, yil yakuniga qadar 230 ming oilani kambag‘allikdan chiqarish vazifasi belgilandi.
Har bir yo‘nalish bo‘yicha aniq mexanizm v…
Ehtiyojmand oilalarni ijtimoiy himoya qilishda yangi yondashuvlar joriy etiladi
Yig‘ilishda ehtiyojmand oilalarning ijtimoiy himoyasini kuchaytirishga qaratilgan yangi yondashuvlar belgilab berildi.
Ijtimoiy himoya milliy agentligiga yil yakuniga qadar ehtiyojmand aholini “ijtimoiy reyestr”ga kiritish tizimini qayta ko‘rib chiqish topshirildi.
Bunda aholi daromadi bilan birga surunkali kasallik, nogironlik, ko‘p b…
Ishlaydigan onalarga farzandi bir yoshga to‘lguniga qadar Ijtimoiy sug‘urta jamg‘armasidan nafaqa to‘lanadi.
Mehnatga layoqatsiz ehtiyojmand oilalarga “passiv daromad” keltiradigan ijtimoiy paket uchun joriy yil 300 milliard so‘m ajratilgan.
Bunday yordam olgan 11 ming oilaning yarmida daromad sezilarli oshgani qayd etildi.
Bir haftada ushbu tizimni davom ettirish bo‘yicha qaror loyihasini kiritish topshirildi.
–…
Eng namunali hokim yordamchilariga 50 foizgacha ustama to‘lanadi
Mutasaddilarga ikki oyda o‘quv markazi tashkil etib, xorijdan mutaxassislar jalb qilish vazifasi qo‘yildi.
Ushbu markazda hokim yordamchilari “loyihabay” ishlashga o‘qitiladi.
Viloyat shtablari yil yakunida har bir tumandan eng yaxshi ikki nafar hokim yordamchisini Xitoy, Yaponiya va Turkiyaga malaka oshirishga yuboradi.
Eng namunali hokim yordamchi…
Tuman shtabiga loyihalash, qurilish va sifat nazoratini xususiy sektorga berishga ruxsat etiladi
Joylardagi tadbirkorlik infratuzilmasi loyihalarini yuritish tizimi ham qayta ko‘rib chiqiladi.
Hozir bu masalalar asosan viloyat darajasida hal qilinayotgani ishlarning cho‘zilishiga sabab bo‘layotgani qayd etildi.
Tumanni loyihalarning buyurtmachisiga aylantirish va mablag‘larni bevosita joylarga yo‘naltirish ishlarn…
Tuman shtabi subsidiya yoki foizsiz ssuda berish masalasini ham mustaqil hal qiladi
Kredit tarixida kechikish bo‘lgan ehtiyojmand aholining loyihalarini ham individual baholash asosida imtiyozli moliyalashtirish imkoniyati yaratiladi.
Kambag‘allik jamg‘armasidagi 240 milliard so‘m, Bandlik jamg‘armasidagi 100 milliard so‘m va uchta “daftar”dagi 760 milliard so‘m mablag‘ tuman shtablari ixtiyoriga beriladi.
Endi tu…
Hokim yordamchilari “loyihabay” ishlash tizimiga o‘tkaziladi
Kredit, subsidiya va kompensatsiya shartlarini farmon va qarorlar bilan belgilash amaliyotidan voz kechilishi ma’lum qilindi.
Endi Iqtisodiyot vazirligi va Markaziy bank hududlar salohiyatidan kelib chiqib, moliyalashtirish mexanizmlarini har chorakda yangilab boradi.
Tuman shtablari mahallalardagi hokim yordamchilarini “loyihabay” ishlash tizimiga o‘tka…
Yig‘ilishda mahalla bankirlari va hokim yordamchilarining loyihalar bilan ishlash ko‘nikmalari tanqidiy baholandi.
Ularning aksariyati kimga kredit kerakligi, qaysi loyihani lizing, faktoring, kafolat, sug‘urta, aylanma mablag‘ yoki shartnoma asosida moliyalashtirish mumkinligini tushunmasligi qayd etildi.
Bankirlar va hokim yordamchilari loyiha tayyorlashdan oldin hamon “Garovi bormi?” degan savolni qo‘yayotgani t…
Kambag‘allikni qisqartirishda mavjud imkoniyatlardan samarali foydalanish talab etiladi
Prezidentimiz topshirig‘iga ko‘ra, iqtisodiy kompleksning barcha rahbarlari Xorazmda qolib, kambag‘allik bilan ishlash tizimini o‘zgartirish bo‘yicha tahlil o‘tkazdi.
Ikki hafta davomida viloyatdagi 81 ming kambag‘al aholi, ya’ni 19 ming oilaning holati o‘rganildi. Ushbu oilalarda 12 ming ishsiz va 10 ming daromadi past aholi bo…
Davlatimiz rahbari ayrim hudud rahbarlari qo‘lidagi tayyor resurslardan samarali foydalanib, odamlarni ishli qilishga bilimi yoki toqati yetmayotganini tanqid qildi.
Ular zamonaviy iqtisodiyotdagi tebranishlar va tezkor o‘zgarishlarni to‘g‘ri anglamayotgani ko‘rsatib o‘tildi.
Hududlarda so‘nggi bir yilda tashkil qilingan 86 ming kichik korxonadan 15 mingtasi, ya’ni 17 foizi faoliyatini to‘xtatgan.
Bankdan kredit o…
Yig‘ilishda ajratilgan kredit resurslarining natijadorligi tumanlar kesimida qiyosiy tahlil qilindi.
O‘tgan davrda Sharof Rashidov va Qarshi tumanlariga bir xil – 2 trillion 300 milliard so‘mdan kredit resursi berilgan.
Sharof Rashidov tumanida ushbu mablag‘ hisobidan 30 ming aholi kambag‘allikdan chiqarilgan bo‘lib, bir kishiga o‘rtacha 78 million so‘m to‘g‘ri kelgan. Qarshi tumanida esa 13 ming ehtiyojmandning sh…
Yig‘ilishda joylarda natija bo‘lmayotganining asosiy sabablari tahlil qilindi.
“Mahalla yettiligi” uchun mas’ul rahbarlar viloyat, tuman, shahar va mahalladagi xodimlarga qabul qilingan qarorlarni qanday ijro etish bo‘yicha aniq ko‘rsatmalar bermayotgani qayd etildi.
Ayrim rahbarlar yaratilgan sharoitlardan to‘g‘ri foydalanish va “yettilik” faoliyatiga xolis baho berishni bilmayotgani ko‘rsatib o‘tildi.
Tuman va m…
Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @qoshtepatumanhokimligi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@qoshtepatumanhokimligi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Farg‘ona tumani hokimligi @fargonatumanihokimligi · 50,273 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Farg'onaliklar 25 | РАСМИЙ @Fargonaliklar_Margilonliklar_24 · 71,395 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
FVMMTB - Rasmiy kanali @FarVMMTB · 45,442 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Farg'onaliklar @fargonalilar · 21,988 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qo‘shtepa tumani hokimligi” (@qoshtepatumanhokimligi), 14,693 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qoshtepatumanhokimligi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.