мой хороший товарищ и одна из самых талантливых AI энтузиасток Лена Дернова ведёт свой тг-канал. в отличие от моего, она ведёт его регулярно и добросовестно. и искренне. и авторски. рекомендую https://t.me/lovehateai/404
❤8👍4🎉1

Channel
@qopywriter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,110subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001252416594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qopywriter |
| Created | 8 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qopywriter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 1,110 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,110 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 19 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
212 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 91 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 65 | 30.7% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 9.91% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 7.55% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 3.77% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 2.83% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.943% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.943% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.472% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2024 to 3 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мой хороший товарищ и одна из самых талантливых AI энтузиасток Лена Дернова ведёт свой тг-канал. в отличие от моего, она ведёт его регулярно и добросовестно. и искренне. и авторски. рекомендую https://t.me/lovehateai/404
❤8👍4🎉1
мой хороший друг руслан собрал лайфхаки у креативных и сделал из этого некую методичку / шпаргалку. я там тоже поучаствовал. хорошо зайдёт начинающим в индустрии, да и бывалым будет полезно https://t.me/vashcreator/368
❤7🎉2😱2👍1
тут Влад канал открыл https://t.me/Vlazdislav
👍4🥰4👎1🤔1
прикиньте чо? уже во второй раз становлюсь куратором (aka креативным директором) в mads, только на этот раз на базовом курсе концептинга я тут подсчитал, прошло ровно 5 (пять) лет с того дня, как я сам стал студентом креатива в вордшопе. это было ещё аж до ковида. с тех пор прошло много времени, были выиграны фестивали студенческие и взрослые (чучуть), крэкнуто дофига брифов, убито много нервных клеток и недовыспан…
❤26🔥10👍4🎉3
1/ бронза (с первого слайда презентации было понятно, что это тянет на металл) 2/ мерит (каждый раз смотрю кейс и каждый раз улыбаюсь)
👏16🔥8👍2
помните 2 года назад я хвастался своими студенческими наградами? шок: но сегодня я пришёл хвастаться наградами уже своих студентов, потому что с начала этого года мне посчастливилось побыть креативным директором на фестивальном курсе mads
🔥35❤12🥰4
а по ссылке можно посмотреть весь проект целиком, над ним трудилось много талантливых людей, каждый из которых вложил частичку души. наружка — разъёб https://www.sostav.ru/publication/s-chego-nachinaetsya-otdykh-kogda-broniruesh-ego-na-ostrovke-67170.html
🔥16❤3👍1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥22❤9👍5👎1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @qopywriter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 797,322 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qопирайтер” (@qopywriter), 1,110 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qopywriter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.