Channel
@qlqlnnnhk
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,814subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 2 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001347897533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qlqlnnnhk |
| Description | 青楼社区：@qlql 客服：@qlqlqlql |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qlqlnnnhk |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1.1 average views per post against 10,814 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.01%. Across the 765 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,052–31,599 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.49% and 8.30%, with a median of 3.55%.
| Window | 30 days (4 September 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (20 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 21 |
| Mature posts only | 0.01% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 10,814 measured 2 October 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:zho · 765 channels · p10 0.333% · p25 1.49% · p50 3.55% · p75 8.30% · p90 17.2% |
| Position in cohort | 0.524th percentile · 1/333 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 4 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 23:22 | 10,814 | no change |
| 2 Oct 2026, 22:47 | 10,814 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 September 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 21 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 广州深圳东莞佛山-花满楼 📢 深圳本地 SPA 会所｜95/96 专属服务 高端臻选 📢 裸聊自慰直播网红 📢 杭州马家 📢 佳佳1v1视频陪聊 📢 95/96 服务 SPA 会所｜深圳全城门店 📢 珠海#澳门#深圳95T4 📢 长沙高端 📢 奥迪 江浙沪广 大圈俱乐部 📢 丽水万花楼 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光，赚邀请奖励
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
青楼花魁导航 点击下方开始探花
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qlqlnnnhk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“青楼 南宁花魁榜 @qlql” (@qlqlnnnhk), 10,814 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qlqlnnnhk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.