苏北省教育厅提醒广大学生和家长,要珍惜生命安全、慎重选择培训机构,重点关注机构的办学和消防手续是否正规,安全通道是否通畅,有无违规用火用电,是否组织消防演练等问题。请详见“江苏教育发布”微信公众号。

Channel
秋城落叶的频道👍
@qiuchenlymac
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26,558subscribers
+179 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001933319598 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qiuchenlymac |
| Description | 聊天群链接 https://t.me/+VvqTr-2EFaZhYzA1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qiuchenlymac |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 26,558 | +27 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 26,531 | +46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 26,485 | +17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 26,468 | +24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 26,444 | +23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 26,421 | +38 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 26,383 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 26,379 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.1%
- avg views ÷ 26,558 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,190
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.405%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 26
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (22 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 179,704 |
| Reactions total | 724 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 283
- Videos
- 24
- Links
- 239
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
724 reactions across 23 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 337 | 46.5% | |
| ❤ | 183 | 25.3% | |
| 😁 | 78 | 10.8% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 4.70% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 3.73% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 3.45% | |
| 🖕 | 13 | 1.80% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 1.80% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 1.38% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.276% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.138% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.138% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 724reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
重写了博通Windows下的蓝牙驱动,并实现了完整的AirPods AAP通信协议,苹果耳机电量显示与降噪控制现在可以完整支持。驱动层已经没有阻碍。 由于AAP实现走的是通用蓝牙协议栈,该组件实现可以直接运行于任意Windows电脑上配对苹果耳机,并支持控制降噪与高级功能。目前用户层UI代码还在实现。 还在声卡驱动中修复了苹果官方声卡驱动中的爆音、撕裂等问题,现在跟macOS下除了音色DSP需要调整,驱动层已经实现了所有的扬声器保护与控制算法。
👏32👍12❤5🔥1
问为什么不能用增强的,因为我不想加,我自己写了一个代理:https://qiuchenlyopensource.github.io/Documentaions/network-proxy
👍16🖕6❤2
更正了补丁中的一个错误。
❤7
6.7.0以后的版本官方稍微强化了一下盗版检查导致的节点超时,但没什么用,建议下次加强的时候换个套路。 明天重新上传。
👍16🥰10🖕1😁1
模型支持格式为moc3 live2d,但并未使用官方的moc3库,重新实现了一份C++解析。 参考用到的模型仓库为: https://github.com/chendishen/live2d-model 还有其他的仓库并未收录,但主要是moc3格式的都支持。
垃圾的机场是这样的
😁14🥰8
QiuChen壁纸需要进一步收取用户评价。 *已经通过邮件免费发放了数十个专业版授权,至于卡顿问题本机RX 550 AMD并没有遇到,需要识别是否端侧问题引起。
❤8🖕5
我已经把跟我辩论qiuchen proxy 好还是花钱买Surge正版好的傻逼拉黑ban了。 有几个原因: 1. 我在上班,同时还在调windows驱动,或者修各种破解问题,实在没空辩论这种浪费时间的b话题。 2. qiuchen proxy确实不好用,但你买正版就别来我这跟我上眼药,我心情不好是因为老子不收钱还在跟我废话,我做的不好用没事,有些人不打钱还在这b话“你做的不行”是实在是给我上压力。给我上压力?那你就滚吧。 3. 我不做Surge增强不是做不了,是因为我想推广我自己的代理工具。我自己的qiuchen代理内核接口清晰,可以直接接进去,直接修复Surge的增强模式。但这有什么意义呢?总有傻逼自作聪明 “怎么你破解的Surge不能用增强啊?”,动动脑,我为什么要给surge推广用户?别人破解弄不了增强是因为他们搞不定,懂吗?在我这里,这是一个可选项。 怎么看一个人是不是傻逼?你看他攻击你的时候是不是用“你这项目AI开…
👍87🤣7❤6👏2🖕1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁6
压抑周末,做了一个MineCraft模组。 特性: 1. 喂养狼,发展狼,自动在你半径15格内索敌杀敌,并自动叼回一些物品。 2. 随着宠物狗的等级提升,攻击和血量都会提升,攻击索敌范围会更大。 3. 随机出现Boss 或者精英小怪,可以爆出神器,或者爆出一堆没用的垃圾。 4. Boss各自有名称,它也不是傻逼,等着你去爆。他会看情况不对逃跑,但是受伤的跑不快。 5. 狼群效应。范围内低等级狗会跟随高级别狗一起杀敌。 6. 血量过低,你需要常备肉类或者腐肉在背包,战斗中血量不足宠物会自动吃肉回血,一般情况下每种肉类会保留8个,腐肉不在最小限制内。 7. 地图上视野范围外会快刷新被刷光的野羊牛。 8. 养的狗越多,宠物亲和度越高,训化野狗成功率越高。 9. 苦力怕 蜘蛛等生物,在靠近你15格距离内会被狼族大军攻击。
❤2
26.4.1正式版,同步推送到QiuChen商店。 资源站搬运的时候以下内容切记直接复制一字不改,别把傻逼引流给我问为什么打不开。 请在挂载镜像后,双击 Install.app 开始安装。 1. 如果打开 DMG 时提示“已损坏”、“打不开”,请先在 Finder 侧边栏退出当前已挂载的镜像,然后打开“终端”执行: xattr -cr <DMG 文件完整路径> 示例: xattr -cr "/Users/你的用户名/Downloads/ParallelsDesktop-26.3.1.dmg" 也可以先输入: xattr -cr 再把 dmg 文件直接拖进终端窗口,系统会自动补全完整路径,然后按回车执行。 执行完成后,重新双击 DMG 即可。 2. 当前发布的 DMG 已完成数字签名,不需要也不要自行执行 codesign。 手动重签会破坏应用签名状态,导致 PD 无法正常运行。 3. 请认准 QiuChenly …
👍18❤5😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @qiuchenlymac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 759,581 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秋城落叶的频道👍” (@qiuchenlymac), 26,558 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qiuchenlymac.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.