Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 奇趣吃瓜🍉

Channel

奇趣吃瓜🍉

@qiquchigua66

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

63,891subscribers

-1,838 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001936170464
TypeChannel
Username@qiquchigua66
Description私信 @qiquchigua66_bot 群组 @qiquchigua66chat
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/qiquchigua66

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

63,89165,74964,8207 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,838. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,612–66,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 21:4163,891-22
8 Nov 2026, 15:1163,913-39
7 Nov 2026, 09:1963,952-29
6 Nov 2026, 06:4663,981-11
5 Nov 2026, 04:0863,992-20
4 Nov 2026, 07:0964,012-6
3 Nov 2026, 07:5864,018-23
2 Nov 2026, 10:4764,041-12
1 Nov 2026, 07:2164,053-14
31 Oct 2026, 08:0664,067-35
30 Oct 2026, 05:2064,102-29
29 Oct 2026, 07:0064,131-21
28 Oct 2026, 07:3064,152-10
27 Oct 2026, 10:0164,162-16
26 Oct 2026, 10:4964,178-3
25 Oct 2026, 13:1164,181+17
24 Oct 2026, 15:3564,164-24
23 Oct 2026, 18:1064,188-14
22 Oct 2026, 18:0964,202-25
21 Oct 2026, 11:3564,227first reading

Engagement

258 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.01%
avg views ÷ 63,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,840
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.096%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 258 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held258 (3 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total257,254
Reactions total221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 01:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,020
Videos
≈1,140
Links
≈16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 23m
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 169 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

653 reactions across 188 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤29545.2%
👍19229.4%
🤣345.21%
👎274.13%
🤡172.60%
🤮172.60%
💩111.68%
🥰101.53%
🤬71.07%
🤷‍♂60.919%
👏50.766%
😁50.766%
🔥40.613%
🤔40.613%
🤪30.459%
🥱30.459%
🌭20.306%
😱20.306%
🤩20.306%
🎉10.153%
6 further kinds60.919%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 209 of the 258 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 258 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (1.49%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 11:29 UTC894 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @chiguaxdPhoto

#杭州临平 #杭州枪击 #临平 # 11月8日夜间,杭州临平发生枪击事件,疑涉玉石交易尾款纠纷,缅甸老板雇凶杀人! 中国老板拖欠玉石尾款,缅甸老板因此派遣杀手追讨,最终演变成血腥枪击案。 一名缅甸籍枪手在杭州临平枪杀两名受害者后,逃入京都夏宫一栋别墅内,最终被警方击毙。

❤2

8 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,270 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

现在这些小孩什么都敢发朋友圈

👍3❤1

8 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC≈2,180 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤2👍1

8 Nov 2026, 04:02 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 10 November 2026

#频道互推 #群组推荐 多网盘影视资源分享 熊猫资源_游戏软件破解 国产电视剧频道(每日更新) 小新の资源库|实用软件工具 txt爽文小说 二手机场流转中心 金十数据 闪电资讯 深度 好文 (付费文章共享) 𝕎𝔼电报频道精选推荐 电报频道索引 互推:@miaomiao333bot

7 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTC≈3,000 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

有些人变态起来是真变态,我都没看懂他要干嘛

7 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC≈2,960 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

模子哥:最怕这种小阿姨,一上来就要舌吻!

7 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC≈2,870 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

有这种网红存在,东北老铁一时半会洗不白了!

7 Nov 2026, 11:06 UTC≈2,820 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

柴犬养是养不熟了,看能不能煮熟吧!

❤1

7 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,790 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

震惊!日本双刀“武士”美国街头硬刚警察,不到3秒清空弹夹! 日本动漫看多了真以为刀能挡子弹??

👍2

4 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈4,800 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

当着男朋友面给后车比心,结果男朋友不惯着直接走了😂

❤2

4 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTC≈4,620 views6 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

玩偶姐姐也扛不住了,亏麻了。现在开始全球可飞价格5万刀 八小时

🤣4❤2

3 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC≈5,040 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

男的也能干出水?有没有gay说一下

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 258 posts we hold for @qiquchigua66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @qiquchigua66 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“奇趣吃瓜🍉” (@qiquchigua66), 63,891 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qiquchigua66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.