Channel
@qingyun4T3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
417subscribers
+90 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003995986829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qingyun4T3 |
| Created | 9 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qingyun4T3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 417 | +84 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 333 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 327 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 327 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2 (9 June 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 170 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
西安卿云4T丨服务内容介绍 都市奔波，身体总在负重前行🌿 卿云4T SPA，寻一处静谧角落 精油浸润，舒缓紧绷肌肉，释放积攒压力 肩颈调理｜全身SPA｜头部腿部舒压 独立私密包间淋浴，用品一客一换 把疲惫卸下，还给身体一份松弛与温柔✨ ⚽️套餐：卿云全裸4T 【599/60分不限次释放】 ⚽️内容：指尖寻宝，卿云过水，妩媚鼻息，漫游全身，魅惑胸推，巧乐毒龙，猴子偷桃，玉腿夹根，美臀滑推，妙手回春，黑丝绕身，玉足揉根，舌绕龙根，胸划浮水，等等…… 本店铺是独家秘方技师采用所有南方姑娘，打造最专业，最具有服务性的高端4T店面，细致的服务给您每一次的体验都增加舒心放松的感受，00后，95后高颜值。以及独特的大美江南风手法！ 营业时间🕧（中午1:00-凌晨3：00） 客服预约丨点击这里联系 双向限制丨点击这里联系 交流大群丨4T研究院群组 客户好评丨反馈更新频道 本店技师丨资料介绍频道
👍2
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @qingyun4T3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西安卿云4T资料更新” (@qingyun4T3), 417 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qingyun4T3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.