无限收量,欢迎各位老板前来咨询,费率冰点,质量高 😀移动支付宝网厅😀 😀电信支付宝网厅😀 😀微信转QQ😀 😀数字人民币😀 😀支付宝联通原生商城😀 😀支付宝原生小额😀 😀微信联通原生😀 😀微信原生小额😀 😀各类UID系列😀 😀微信生活缴费😀 😀支付宝生活缴费😀 需要的宝宝们联系:@QingJu111 @QingJu333 青橘支付唯一频道:https://t.me/qingjuzhifu1

Channel
青橘支付
@qingjuzhifu1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
145subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003491281410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qingjuzhifu1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 12 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qingjuzhifu1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 145 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 147 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 150 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 159 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 165 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 179 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 179 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😍移动已全面恢复 😍112移动支付宝 💰💰🤓 😍2004支付宝iOS 💰💰🤓 全面值⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
😍112移动支付宝 6⃣0⃣🤓 😍2004支付宝iOS 7⃣0⃣🤓 全面值⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
以下通道正常开启↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓ 112 移动支付宝网厅 ❗❗ 2001 电信支付宝网厅 ❗❗ 113 支付宝联通原生商城 ❗❗ 1113 支付宝原生小额 ❗❗ 114 微信联通原生 ❗❗ 1114 微信原生小额 ❗❗ 4002 微信转QQ ❗❗ 5001 数字人民币 ❗❗ 各UID系列全面覆盖 💥💥💥💥 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 😊😊😊各通道均已完成全面优化,成功率高,码量充足。。请各位及时开启,确保业绩持续提升😊😊😊
2004移动网厅ios 月初成率拉满 稳定70+ 上上权重 加加量啦 老板们
4002 微信跳转QQ原生成率 35🤓 全面值10-200 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
❤1
2004移动网厅ios 月初成率拉满 稳定70+ 上上权重 加加量啦 老板们
❤1
4002 微信跳转QQ原生成率 35🤓 全面值10-200 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
😍112移动支付宝 6⃣0⃣🤓 😍2004支付宝iOS 7⃣0⃣🤓 全面值⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 😞跟上脚步👣 我的客户必暴富‼ 搞钱啦💋💋充足 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
😍112移动支付宝 6⃣0⃣🤓 😍2004支付宝iOS 7⃣0⃣🤓 全面值⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
😍112移动支付宝 6⃣0⃣🤓 😍2004支付宝iOS 7⃣0⃣🤓 全面值⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
😍112移动支付宝 6⃣0⃣🤓 😍2004支付宝iOS 7⃣0⃣🤓 全面值⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ |⚡⚡⚡ 需要的联系配置 费率冰点 谢谢老板支持青橘⚡⚡⚡🎁🎁🎁
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qingjuzhifu1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@qingjuzhifu1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“青橘支付” (@qingjuzhifu1), 145 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qingjuzhifu1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.