Channel
@qingdaofu9
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
274subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001924463904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qingdaofu9 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qingdaofu9 |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 274 | -3 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 277 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 279 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 283 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 290 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 291 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 294 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 294 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 31 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2024 to 20 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
红塔银行 山西银行系列 厦门国际银行 融兴村镇银行 （系列） 会宁会师村镇银行 河间融惠村镇银行 鄂托克旗汇泽村镇银行 鄂尔多斯银行 天津津南村镇银行 沂源博商村镇银行 汪清和润村镇银行 江西裕民村镇银行 景县丰源村镇银行 长春二道农商村镇银行 长春朝阳和润村镇银行 天津宁河村镇银行 文山民丰村镇银行 山东高青汇金村镇银行 圆融村镇银行 （系列） 海南农信邢台银行 厦门银行 重庆银行 海峡银行 张家口银行 四川银行 贵州花溪建设村镇银行 仁怀蒙阴村镇银行 会宁会师村镇 新 老 清徐惠明村镇 新老 河间融汇村镇 新 老 临高惠丰村镇银行 融兴村镇银行 孟津民丰村镇银行 河南栾川民丰村镇银行 内蒙古： 银行：鄂托克汇泽村镇银行 银行：罕台村镇银行 银行：乌兰察布集宁蒙商村镇银行 @gs8889999
❤1
《致远集团》 验卡频道🚗 pinned Deleted message
《致远集团》 验卡频道🚗 pinned Deleted message
Photo, posted without a caption
🎉致远集团祝大家蛇年大吉，新年吉祥！🐍✨ 在这辞旧迎新的时刻，致远集团全体员工衷心祝愿大家在新的一年里，事业腾飞，家庭幸福，财运亨通！💼💰🌟 愿大家在蛇年里万事如意，心想事成，吉祥如意！🍀🎊 祝大家新春快乐，身体健康，笑口常开，生活美满！🎆🥳 致远
Photo, posted without a caption
《致远集团》 验卡频道🚗 pinned «点击蓝色字体直达导航 📱. 四大九商手银模板 📱. 地方银行农信农商手银模板 📱. 地方银行农信农商模板第二页 📱.地方银行农信农商模板第三页（持续更新中） 📱. 各大银行公户模板 📱. 飞机防盗指南 📱. 飞机双向解除办法 📱. 飞机官方下载地址 📱. 致远集团---供需频道»
《致远集团》 验卡频道🚗 pinned a photo
点击蓝色字体直达导航 📱. 四大九商手银模板 📱. 地方银行农信农商手银模板 📱. 地方银行农信农商模板第二页 📱.地方银行农信农商模板第三页（持续更新中） 📱. 各大银行公户模板 📱. 飞机防盗指南 📱. 飞机双向解除办法 📱. 飞机官方下载地址 📱. 致远集团---供需频道
👍1
日照银行
珠江村镇银行
上海华瑞银行
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @qingdaofu9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《致远集团》 验卡频道🚗” (@qingdaofu9), 274 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qingdaofu9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.