#ETH 以太坊的强度要明显优于大盘,已经突破阻力,在2540稳住会测试2600,是一个短线机会,至于延续性,要看中轨的测试情况,可能2630-2680吧~🌟
❤15👍11🔥11🎉4

Channel
@qihangbtc1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,279subscribers
-267 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001968344875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qihangbtc1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qihangbtc1 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 10,279 | -46 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 10,325 | -16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 10,341 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 10,349 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 10,362 | -13 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 10,375 | -25 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 10,400 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 10,406 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 10,407 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:08 | 10,413 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 10,421 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 10,423 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 10,424 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 10,429 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 10,437 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 10,440 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 10,445 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 10,450 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 10,464 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 10,469 | first reading |
63 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 63 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,732 reactions across 62 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 719 | 26.3% | |
| 🎉 | 695 | 25.4% | |
| 👍 | 663 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 643 | 23.5% | |
| 😇 | 6 | 0.22% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.146% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.037% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.037% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#ETH 以太坊的强度要明显优于大盘,已经突破阻力,在2540稳住会测试2600,是一个短线机会,至于延续性,要看中轨的测试情况,可能2630-2680吧~🌟
❤15👍11🔥11🎉4
近期摸顶的话,先看一下ETF什么时候转流出,这是目前比较重要的一个指标,资金不会骗人
👍15❤13🎉10🔥7
如果站稳8w测试中轨,那之前的高点81500,大概率会被突破,阻力不适用的情况下,就关注上涨楔形的阻力也就是82500左右
🔥14❤12🎉11👍6
最低到了77600左右,这里的图表,思路也比较明确了,因为目前的价格主要是由于买单比较强,总体的话还是以横代跌
🎉12👍12🔥10❤9
短线机会来一个,一小时级别高位以横代跌,盘整地位77300-76600两个位置,分批可以参与一次短线的反弹多,TP关注入场后的反弹力度吧~
❤13🔥13🎉12👍8
现货的兄弟也不用着急,即这次的上涨两个原因,第一是国债,第二是爆空,最高30亿级别的空头清算,ETF的资金流入也突破了26年新高,延续到今天明显有点量能不足了 在等待消息落地之后频繁利空情况下还能维持稳定的流入还有延续,那不用怀疑就是牛回,但正常行情需要有清杠杆的过程,会重新有更稳的现货支撑,你只需要记住价格的底部会一次比一次高,我们只需要寻找这个底部
🎉14❤11👍11🔥8
本周有四个信息要关注:今晚的制裁公告,周三的PCE,周四英伟达财报,周五沃什讲话📌
👍12🔥11🎉10❤9
给踏空的两个建议,目前唯二能操作的位置,一个是76000以下左侧多,第二个是在81500上方测试遇阻后才能做空的机会
🎉15❤12👍12🔥6
我倒下了兄弟们...打止损就走吧,说7w割就割,要做到知行合一,但我还是坚持长期看空的观点,我觉得这次虽然亏了2k点,但是继续涨,我的空下一波起码可以做到1w以上的空间,只看什么时候会出现拐点
❤18👍11🎉8🔥8🤗1
干了兄弟们!🥰
❤17👍14🎉7😇6🔥4🐳3
理智追车,积累的多头太多,车太重,勾庄也不是慈善家,空头兄弟也记得,100%没跌完,还有一个5.8w以下的低点,错了欢迎来打脸~
🎉15👍14❤11🔥11
这样发各位就可以理解吧,还需要做一个假突破,或震荡,或盘整,就是等散户上套,只要突破,67600以上,只做空不做多,杠杆倍数降低,止损拉到7w以上
🎉17🔥16❤10👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @qihangbtc1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“启航比特币币圈策略分析🚀” (@qihangbtc1), 10,279 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qihangbtc1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.