Channel
@qie366
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
815subscribers
-53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001512677181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qie366 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qie366 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 815 | -51 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 866 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 866 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 868 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#网友曝光 #OB德州俱乐部 “杀猪盘” 骗局 有玩家曝光 OB德州俱乐部，采用黑客户钱的手段，用户只能输钱，无法赢钱。 自己因看到 OB德州 的各类宣传广告，首次进入该俱乐部玩德州扑克，赢了几千美元后却立刻遭到封号。联系客服后，客服以 “未报备” 为由封号，虽声称已解封，但实际进入牌桌依旧显示封号状态。多次联系后，客服以技术问题为由拖延处理，疑似因用户赢钱而故意为之。 网友建议，线上德州扑克游戏最好选择信誉良好的平台，或与朋友私下约局，避免被不法平台套路，误以为是自己运气或牌技问题。
#网友投稿 #海鸥体育 #Ho体育 #博系包网 #避雷！ 黑平台曝光黑台子：【海鸥体育,Ho体育】，专门黑盈利玩家！ 本人账号：lemon1314 上级账户 tg4b1011 ,TG1-1Z-Angle-杨颖 经过事实： 在海鸥体育平台充值本金100000元，正常进行娱乐投注，账户盈利后余额合计19万余元，晚上账户直接遭到平台冻结。 代理污蔑玩家“对刷、异常投注”，以此为借口拒绝解冻账户、拒绝安排出款，只会不断空口扣帽子。 后续找到海鸥体育的部长飞机联系方式@qwer9373，给发出代理线吃本金的情况，寻求解决办法，部长也是一丘之貉，从里到外烂完了海鸥，一毛钱都别充了各位，连管理层都是如此糜烂。 做博彩就是做博彩，这个公司纯搞诈骗，柬埔寨物业公司要好好管理一下这个公司了，现在博彩业本来就难了，口碑被这些老鼠屎搞坏了，客户都被这些黑公司坑没了，都不玩了，一定要严格治理没信誉的黑台子，还正规博彩公司生存的空间。在柬埔寨当下…
网友曝光 #黑平台 #亚游集团 投稿曝光一个黑台子亚游集团，还有在玩的老板们可要看好自己钱袋子，几千R都输不起你还开你妈的台子啊，骗你爹来玩的时候说的那么好听，赢你们点钱还得交保证金打流水才给出，垃圾平台，不处理天天发曝光 PS：这种野鸡台都是怎么找到的？
@htyl #宏图娱乐，只可以输钱不可以赢钱，我充值了8500个u。 取款一个475u。 然后也没有赢回来，说我游戏异常此时游戏账号有4700个u。竟然直接冻结，客服联系我说我游戏异常，退回最后一笔充值本金1000u。我本着退一点是一点到手的才是钱，钱到了再曝光，到最后充值8500u。取款共到账了一共1600个u，大家注意这个网站，只能输不能赢，赢了就说你异常，谨慎游戏。
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @qie366. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,178,151 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“曝光黑平台” (@qie366), 815 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qie366.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.