#草房安安 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/60419
❤1

Channel
@qicherj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,967subscribers
+311 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002195932528 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qicherj |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qicherj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 11,967 | +43 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 11,924 | +18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 11,906 | +40 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 11,866 | +49 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 11,817 | +34 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 11,783 | +86 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 11,697 | +41 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 11,656 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 11,656 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (31 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 155,918 |
| Reactions total | 239 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
239 reactions across 28 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 100 | 41.8% | |
| 👎 | 37 | 15.5% | |
| 🤣 | 32 | 13.4% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 10.5% | |
| 💩 | 13 | 5.44% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 4.18% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 2.93% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 2.09% | |
| 🙊 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.837% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#草房安安 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/60419
❤1
💃老师:#兔兔酱 🤖链接:https://t.me/bjwyls/24001?single 🏠位置:#朝阳 #四惠 ------------------ 简单说明一下前后经过:客人是 10 号晚上约的 想二刷老师,以不给优惠就差评来沟通,细节不祥,最后沟通没成功,差评有些针对性了,情况属不属实。还要看后续兄弟反馈,特作 3 单活动,希望去的兄弟给出真实反馈, 参与活动点链接 : https://t.me/bjwyhd/4848?single
❤2
💃老师:#兔兔酱 🤖链接:https://t.me/bjwyls/24001?single 🏠位置:#朝阳 #四惠 ------------------ 🖋课后作业:非常糟糕的一次cj体验,晚上cj的时间稍微有点晚了,但是去之前和🐔沟通好了,如果太晚ls没休息好我就明天来,没有关系。🐔聊着说不晚不晚,放心会给我服务好,今天单子不多,没事放心来。 门开着缝我自己进去,ls是一直端坐在沙发上,一脸脸的不耐烦,一脸的sm脸,说我这单她不接,太晚了?我脾气上来了,日nm老子大老远跑过来给我司马脸看?不接也要接。然后她是一动不动 ,让我自己洗澡,不陪浴不说,卫生间连沐浴露都没有?好我忍。坐着和小姑娘亲热了一会,吻下,她和说我嘴巴疼,她张嘴给我看,嘴里nm一大个洞。吓死老子一跳,我当时吓坏了,以为是梅毒一期,想想这么小年龄应该不会吧?然后她说去医院看过,是普通口腔溃疡(好我忍)。然后,她就是以此为借口,既没亲🐍,也没给我口。脱掉衣服看了下…
❤9
#艾薇 https://t.me/hahbj8/59677
❤2
💃老师:#清兰 🤖链接:https://t.me/bjwyls/6659?single 🏠位置:#朝阳 #酒仙桥 ------------------ 🖋课后作业:清兰报告 @M336sc 颜值:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 真人真照,颜值确实不错,眼睛很大,天然美女类型,妆容也比较精致,在同价位中算中等偏上 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤雪白细腻无纹身,身材比例一般,没胸没屁股 服务:⭐️⭐️ 基本是没有的,嫩妹三件套 性格:⭐️⭐️ 全程冷场,进门不接,出门不送,基本无交流 综合:⭐️⭐️ 3k块的快餐,软机车,适合只看脸的ly
❤4
💃老师:#阿瑶商k 🤖链接: https://t.me/bjwyls/20925?single 🏠位置: #北京 #商k ------------------ 🖋课后作业:出个作业,才从这个商k出来,这个场地非常差,姑娘没几个,质量非常差,说是游戏场但是一点氛围没有。场地是一个没有人的酒吧,姑娘没几个人,不主动,瓶装啤酒百威铝罐120一瓶,其他也差不多十几块一瓶,房间小的不行,装修差,门口安保人员凶神恶煞,感官极差!在北京去过十几个场子,这个是最差的,没有之一!超级差评!
❤3
💃老师:#圆子08嫩妹会喷水 🤖链接: https://t.me/bjwyls/14821?single 🏠位置: #朝阳 #京铁瑞园C区 ------------------ 🖋课后作业:偷钱、偷钱、偷钱、偷了我八千港币、八百块人民币!加上我给的水费1.3千!共偷得1.1万! 本人刚从澳门下飞机、然后因为内心燥热气愤,就草草找了一个为缓解内心燥热,可恰恰这次出击,给我深深上了一课!因为身上没带人民币,现场取了两千人民币放在包里,另包里还剩下结余1.9万港币! 故事就在这里展开了,到了现场老师说先给钱,然后不经意间就掏出钱包,甩了1.3K给老师,但是老师真是恶向胆边生昂,看到了我钱包的尾数,在草草结束之后,洗澡的间隙,悄咪咪的从钱包里顺走了八千港币加八百现金!在我出来后像个没事人一样坐在椅子上,当我洗好澡穿衣服的时候,突然发现钱包放在沙发上(不聪敏了,虽然不在意钱,但是我钱包都是随时放在裤子口袋里的),带着怀疑,我打开钱包,输了…
❤17🙊4😨3
#望京诗诗 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/59178
夏奈可可 @JY66636999 超级离谱 真人巨胖开门看了一眼我就走了 超级照骗 这个真人体重有照片2个 目测180斤的女的 还有点诚信吗 华贸城基本全是待聊假照片
😁3👎1
💃老师:#苏亦 🤖链接:https://t.me/bjwyls/23841?single 🏠位置:#朝阳#青年路 ------------------ 🖋课后作业:苏亦,整体是个中评,人照8分,身材还可以,服务水平一般,情绪价值没有,事多,说好的陪浴约等于没有,舌吻也没有,其实要不是活动想给差评的,下次不会再来
👎1
#望京诗诗 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/59178
❤1👎1
#大蜜甜馨 频道链接:https://t.me/hahbj8/57248
👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @qicherj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“骑车日记” (@qicherj), 11,967 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qicherj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.