Channel
@qianqianbaogaolan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004425297243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qianqianbaogaolan |
| Created | 26 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qianqianbaogaolan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 | 3 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 3 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 26 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (26 October 2026 – 28 October 2026) |
| Views total | 253 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【客服榜报告模版】 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：10.×× 【出击人ID】：狗蛋 【老师艺名】：浅浅 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：厦门 【茶费次数】：7 【目测年龄】：18 【人照相似】：80（满分100） 【本人颜值】：85（满分100） 【肤色质感】：嫩白滑 【课表满足】：有蛇，无陪洗 【情绪价值】：（满分100）80 【日☀后评语】：（不低于50字）准时到地点，见面第一眼感觉人照不太像，再仔细看下人照80吧，过去让我直接洗澡刷牙，没赔洗，感觉有点职业，妹子最近长胖了，胸变小了，感觉没有b，但是屁股很大，洗吹做一套，服务精神还不错，爱干净，口一下用纸擦一下，口完戴套妹纸自己坐上来，把我摇出来了，直接123。总结：有服务，但是不多，长相不差，身材差点意思 【总体评分】：（满分100）85 【推荐指数】：（最高7颗⭐） 【客服榜…
【客服榜报告模版】 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：10 【出击人ID】：Booo997 【老师艺名】：浅浅 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：厦门 【茶费次数】：7 【目测年龄】：18 【人照相似】：99（满分100） 【本人颜值】：95（满分100） 【肤色质感】：嫩白滑 【课表满足】：有蛇，有陪洗 【情绪价值】：（满分100）99 【日☀后评语】：（不低于50字）浅浅一看就感觉以前见过，见面后还真是去年在桃花那边有约过。简单聊了一下，浅浅很会聊，比以前成熟了很多。也更懂照顾表哥的情绪价值了，可能也是跟她上岸去KTV干过一段时间有关。更懂男人需要什么，这次的体验很不错。懂服务懂情绪价值还有🐍的嫩妹，已经很全能了……出门还会给我送小零食，太有女友感了 【总体评分】：（满分100）98 【推荐指数】：（最高7颗⭐） 【客服榜】 t.me/…
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @qianqianbaogaolan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“浅浅报告” (@qianqianbaogaolan), 3 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qianqianbaogaolan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.