💬 Curious how people here handle cold storage. I’ve been comparing different setups, and one option I looked at recently: @QRQRQ 💘 Official Channel: @AirGapTronlink_en

Channel
@QRQRQ Air Gap Tronlink is the safest!
@qianbao011
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001736897583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qianbao011 |
| Created | 21 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qianbao011 |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 119 | -3 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 122 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 114 | -6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 120 | +6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 114 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 109 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 105 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 96 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 96 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 95 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
💬 Anyone here using cold wallets with offline keys? I’ve been testing a few solutions—this one I came across seems pretty straightforward: @QRQRQ 💘 Official Channel: @AirGapTronlink_en
💬 Anyone using cold wallets with offline keys? I’m exploring crypto storage solutions: @QRQRQ
💬 Кто использует холодные кошельки с офлайн ключами? Изучаю решения по хранению крипты: @QRQRQ
💬 Кто пользуется холодными кошельками с офлайн ключами? Интересуюсь безопасным хранением крипты. Смотрю разные решения: @QRQRQ 💘: @AirGapTronlink_en
Не реклама, просто делюсь тем, что изучал по теме холодных кошельков.
Not advertising anything, just sharing a tool I found useful during my research on asset security.
I noticed many users underestimate private key exposure risks. Sharing something I came across while researching this topic.
I’ve been exploring cold wallet solutions recently. What do you guys think about fully offline key storage systems?
I’ve been looking into cold wallet security recently. One thing that stood out is how keeping private keys offline significantly reduces exposure risk. Some tools in this space also combine security features with simple onboarding, which might be interesting for people exploring self-custody. Sharing for reference only: @QRQRQ 💘 Official Channel: @AirGapTronlink_en
A lot of people underestimate how important offline key storage is. Cold wallet systems that fully isolate private keys from networks are generally considered safer against online attacks. I’ve seen a few implementations in the Tron ecosystem, sharing here in case anyone is researching this topic: @QRQRQ
Has anyone here been using air-gapped / cold wallet setups? I’ve been comparing a few solutions recently. The main advantage seems to be eliminating online exposure of private keys. If anyone is exploring similar tools, you can check this for reference: @QRQRQ
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qianbao011. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@QRQRQ Air Gap Tronlink is the safest!” (@qianbao011), 119 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qianbao011.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.