Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QG do Vôlei

Channel

QG do Vôlei

@qgdovolei

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Cite this entry

41,176subscribers

-1,024 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531957749
TypeChannel
Username@qgdovolei
DescriptionCanal destinado aos fãs de Vôlei nacional e internacional. Redes Sociais: https://avely.me/qgdovolei Por favor, não divulgue links de outros grupos, promoções ou golpes.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/qgdovolei

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

41,17642,20041,6887 August 2026 — 42,200 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,200 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,174 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,157 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,125 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,112 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,073 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,047 subscribers15 August 2026 — 42,020 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41,984 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,956 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,939 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,926 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,906 subscribers22 August 2026 — 41,891 subscribers24 August 2026 — 41,868 subscribers25 August 2026 — 41,846 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,815 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,799 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,788 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,773 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,754 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,736 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,722 subscribers2 September 2026 — 41,694 subscribers3 September 2026 — 41,689 subscribers5 September 2026 — 41,664 subscribers9 September 2026 — 41,750 subscribers11 September 2026 — 41,754 subscribers13 September 2026 — 41,737 subscribers15 September 2026 — 41,713 subscribers16 September 2026 — 41,693 subscribers19 September 2026 — 41,686 subscribers26 September 2026 — 41,597 subscribers4 October 2026 — 41,508 subscribers8 October 2026 — 41,419 subscribers13 October 2026 — 41,371 subscribers14 October 2026 — 41,342 subscribers15 October 2026 — 41,328 subscribers16 October 2026 — 41,313 subscribers17 October 2026 — 41,299 subscribers18 October 2026 — 41,287 subscribers19 October 2026 — 41,277 subscribers20 October 2026 — 41,266 subscribers21 October 2026 — 41,251 subscribers22 October 2026 — 41,240 subscribers24 October 2026 — 41,233 subscribers25 October 2026 — 41,222 subscribers26 October 2026 — 41,208 subscribers26 October 2026 — 41,193 subscribers28 October 2026 — 41,176 subscribers7 August 202628 October 2026
52 measurements spanning 81 days, net -1,024. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,022–42,354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 00:0041,176-17
26 Oct 2026, 22:5141,193-15
26 Oct 2026, 02:1941,208-14
25 Oct 2026, 02:4841,222-11
24 Oct 2026, 00:2041,233-7
22 Oct 2026, 22:1641,240-11
21 Oct 2026, 22:5841,251-15
20 Oct 2026, 19:1141,266-11
19 Oct 2026, 15:0641,277-10
18 Oct 2026, 14:5841,287-12
17 Oct 2026, 16:0741,299-14
16 Oct 2026, 13:3641,313-15
15 Oct 2026, 15:2641,328-14
14 Oct 2026, 16:1641,342-29
13 Oct 2026, 04:4641,371-48
8 Oct 2026, 21:3741,419-89
4 Oct 2026, 14:2241,508-89
26 Sept 2026, 06:5641,597-89
19 Sept 2026, 09:1841,686-7
16 Sept 2026, 23:2041,693first reading

Engagement

1,623 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 158 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.46%
avg views ÷ 41,176 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
524 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
561
of 1,623 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 513 of 524 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held1,623 (6 August 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total963,327
Reactions total28,208
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Oct 2026, 08:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈26,900
Videos
≈9,000
Links
≈459

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30m 16s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

58,336 reactions across 924 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤33,58657.6%
🔥4,9238.44%
🤮4,0156.88%
🤣2,3183.97%
😁1,6172.77%
🕊1,5542.66%
👎1,2612.16%
😭1,0881.87%
👏8971.54%
🥱8381.44%
🤔6931.19%
😢6301.08%
🤡6101.05%
👍6011.03%
😱5800.994%
💩5440.933%
🥰4020.689%
🙏2500.429%
🐳1910.327%
🥴1670.286%
49 further kinds1,5712.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 927 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58,336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 September 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2026, 03:53 UTC268 views6 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

💥 Bergamo vence batalha de cinco sets! Em um confronto emocionante pela Liga Italiana feminina, o Bergamo superou o Consolini Volley por 3x2, fora de casa. A equipe mostrou força nos momentos decisivos e garantiu a vitória no tie-break, conquistando dois pontos importantes na competição. 👩🏼‍💻 Pontuadoras da Partida 🔵 Rivero: 21 (3 aces) ⚫️ Kipp: 20 (2 blocks e 2 aces) 🔵 Bracchi: 19 (1 block) ⚫️ Stigrot: 18 (2 blo…

❤4👍1🔥1

28 Oct 2026, 03:52 UTC254 views3 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🇵🇱 UNI Opole vence com autoridade na Polônia! O UNI Opole voltou ao caminho das vitórias na Liga Polonesa feminina! Jogando em casa, na Stegu Arena, a equipe superou o Metalkas Palac Bydgoszcz por 3x0. Sem dar chances de reação ao adversário, o UNI Opole fez valer o mando de quadra e conquistou um importante resultado na competição. 👩🏼‍💻 Pontuadoras da Partida 🟠 Pavlyk: 21 (3 aces) 🔵 Makarewicz: 16 (1 block) 🟠 Ke…

🥱2❤1

28 Oct 2026, 03:28 UTC342 views9 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

👨🏻‍💻 Agenda do dia (Quarta-feira) 🏐 Vôlei de Quadra (Feminino) 🇮🇹 Lega Femminile 🔢 5ª Rodada ⚫ Conegliano x Vallefoglia 🟢 ⏰ 16h 📺 Lega Femminile (YouTube) 🟣 Scandicci x Novara 🔵 ⏰ 16h30 📺 Lega Femminile (YouTube) 🇵🇱 Tauron Liga 🔢 4ª Rodada 🔴 Budowlani x Radomka Radom 🔵 ⏰ 13h30 📺 VBTV ⚫ Stal Mielec x Developres Rzeszów ⚪ ⏰ 15h 📺 VBTV 🏐 Vôlei de Quadra (Masculino) 🇧🇷 Superliga 🔢 1ª Rodada 🔵 Minas x Bauru 🔴 ⏰ …

❤9

28 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC570 views15 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🏖️ Praia Clube estreia com vitória na Superliga! Jogando em Uberlândia, o Praia Clube venceu o São José por 3x0 na abertura da Superliga masculina. Mesmo com a saída de Wilson por lesão no primeiro set, a equipe manteve o ritmo e garantiu a vitória. Paulo, que entrou em seu lugar, marcou 14 pontos e levou o Viva Vôlei. Já Franco foi o maior pontuador, com 15. 👨🏻‍💻 Pontuadores da Partida 🟢 Davy: 16 (2 blocks) 🟡 F…

❤10👎4🔥1

28 Oct 2026, 02:01 UTC656 views8 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⚙️ Suzano estreia com vitória na Superliga! O Suzano começou sua campanha na Superliga masculina vencendo o Goiás por 3x1, diante de sua torcida. A equipe paulista levou a melhor no primeiro set, sofreu o empate na segunda parcial, mas retomou o controle da partida e confirmou a vitória nos dois sets seguintes. Um início positivo para o Suzano, que abre a temporada nacional com o pé direito! 👨🏻‍💻 Pontuadores da P…

❤8

27 Oct 2026, 20:45 UTC≈1,870 views69 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⚪️ Mayara x Olympiacos (5 sets) 25 pontos (1 ace), 14 contra-ataques. Recepcionou 44 saques, 3 erros. 27% de passes positivos, 11% perfeitos. Atacou 44 bolas, 1 erro, sofreu 3 blocks. 55% de aproveitamento ofensivo. Sacou 15 vezes, 4 erros.

❤64🔥3🤔1😁1

27 Oct 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,790 views47 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⚪️ Gabiru x Olympiacos (5 sets) 11 pontos, 1 contra-ataque. Recepcionou 28 saques, 3 erros. 54% de passes positivos, 25% perfeitos. Atacou 36 bolas, 5 erros, sofreu 2 blocks. 31% de aproveitamento ofensivo. Sacou 17 vezes, nenhum erro.

❤33👍10😁3🕊1

27 Oct 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,550 views83 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⚪️ Mara x Olympiacos (5 sets) 3 pontos, 1 contra-ataque. Atacou 8 bolas, 2 erros, sofreu nenhum block. 38% de aproveitamento ofensivo. Sacou 12 vezes, nenhum erro.

🕊67❤8😁7🎅1

27 Oct 2026, 20:37 UTC≈1,530 views13 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🫯Vantagem grega! O Olympiacos levou a melhor sobre o Benfica, de Gabiru, Mara e Mayara, e protagonizou uma grande virada no jogo de ida dos 32 avos de final da Challenger Cup! As equipes voltam à quadra no dia 4 de novembro, para o confronto de volta! 👨🏻‍💻 Pontuadoras da Partida 🔴 Taylor Bannister: 34 (1 ace e 1 block) ⚪ Mayara Barcelos: 25 (1 ace) ⚪ Beatriz Santos: 18 (5 blocks) 🔴 Michaela Mlejnkova: 15 (1 ace e…

❤11🕊2

27 Oct 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,420 views55 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🟡 Alan Souza x Katowice (3 sets) 12 pontos (1 ace e 3 blocks), 6 contra-ataques. Atacou 23 bolas, nenhum erro, sofreu 4 blocks. 35% de aproveitamento ofensivo. Sacou 14 vezes, 3 erros.

🕊43❤10🌭1🤣1

27 Oct 2026, 19:56 UTC≈1,380 views18 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

💪🏼 3 DE 3! O Skra Bełchatów segue com tudo na PlusLiga! A equipe superou o Katowice em sets diretos pela 3ª rodada e manteve sua invencibilidade na competição. São três vitórias consecutivas para o Skra, que confirma o ótimo início de temporada! 👨🏻‍💻 Pontuadores da Partida 🟡 Antoine Pothron: 15 (2 aces e 3 blocks) 🟢 Jakub Szymański: 14 (2 aces e 1 block) 🟡 Alan Souza: 12 (1 ace e 3 blocks) 🟡 Michał Szalacha: 10 🟢…

❤18

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,623 posts we hold for @qgdovolei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@qgdovolei edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Oct 2026, 18:38 UTCAnonymous Poll154 voters

Quem vencerá a partida?

  1. ⚫️ Mackenzie23%
  2. 🟠 Osasco78%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Oct 2026, 23:30 UTCAnonymous Poll201 voters

Qual será o placar hoje?

  1. 🔴 Flamengo 3 - 0 Barueri 🟣66%
  2. 🔴 Flamengo 3 - 1 Barueri 🟣15%
  3. 🔴 Flamengo 3 - 2 Barueri 🟣4%
  4. 🔴 Flamengo 0 - 3 Barueri 🟣5%
  5. 🔴 Flamengo 1 - 3 Barueri 🟣3%
  6. 🔴 Flamengo 2 - 3 Barueri 🟣8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Oct 2026, 17:01 UTCAnonymous Poll101 voters

Qual o seu palpite para esse duelo?

  1. 🟢 Vallefoglia 3 - 0 Scandicci 🟣11%
  2. 🟢 Vallefoglia 3 - 1 Scandicci 🟣6%
  3. 🟢 Vallefoglia 3 - 2 Scandicci 🟣7%
  4. 🟢 Vallefoglia 0 - 3 Scandicci 🟣36%
  5. 🟢 Vallefoglia 1 - 3 Scandicci 🟣37%
  6. 🟢 Vallefoglia 2 - 3 Scandicci 🟣8%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTCAnonymous Poll141 voters

Qual o seu palpite de placar para o confronto?

  1. 🟣 Scandicci 3-0 Chieri 🔵37%
  2. 🟣 Scandicci 3-1 Chieri 🔵42%
  3. 🟣 Scandicci 3-2 Chieri 🔵11%
  4. 🟣 Scandicci 0-3 Chieri 🔵4%
  5. 🟣 Scandicci 1-3 Chieri 🔵5%
  6. 🟣 Scandicci 2-3 Chieri 🔵6%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Sept 2026, 12:59 UTCAnonymous Poll99 voters

Qual o seu palpite de placar para este confronto ?

  1. ⚪️ Novara 3 x 0 Scandicci 🟣6%
  2. ⚪️ Novara 3 x 1 Scandicci 🟣11%
  3. ⚪️ Novara 3 x 2 Scandicci 🟣13%
  4. ⚪️ Novara 0 x 3 Scandicci 🟣14%
  5. ⚪️ Novara 1 x 3 Scandicci 🟣34%
  6. ⚪️ Novara 2 x 3 Scandicci 🟣22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTCAnonymous Poll183 voters

Palpites de placar para este confronto?

  1. ⚫️ Conegliano 3 x 0 Novara ⚪️35%
  2. ⚫️ Conegliano 3 x 1 Novara ⚪️42%
  3. ⚫️ Conegliano 3 x 2 Novara ⚪️14%
  4. ⚫️ Conegliano 0 x 3 Novara ⚪️3%
  5. ⚫️ Conegliano 1 x 3 Novara ⚪️5%
  6. ⚫️ Conegliano 2 x 3 Novara ⚪️4%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 September 2026 to 28 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QG do Vôlei” (@qgdovolei), 41,176 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qgdovolei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.