Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@QFlys🪰

@qflys

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,145subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001363614521
TypeChannel
Username@qflys
Created15 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qflys

Growth

2,1452,1502,147.56 August 2026 — 2,150 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,150 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,148 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,145 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,144–2,151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:252,145-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:322,148-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:012,150no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:582,150first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 43s
Average length
1m 52s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

267 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11844.2%
🔥10037.5%
4717.6%
👏10.375%
🤔10.375%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2022 to 18 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2022, 13:48 UTC≈6,220 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PepeDeluxedPhoto

Why is the FBI's top child porn lawyer involved in the H. Biden laptop case? [special agent Joshua Wilson] Do you see a pattern? Q

👍50🔥172

18 Oct 2022, 13:47 UTC≈5,190 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightVoice message

Hydrogen Peroxide & Gregg Phillips :)

👍19

18 Oct 2022, 13:45 UTC≈4,370 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @questioneverythingQVideo

FUCKING BOOM 💥 BANG ON TARGET 🎯

41🔥17

18 Oct 2022, 13:45 UTC≈3,660 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A lot of people better start blowing whistles or a lot of people are going down in the “I was just following orders,” Narrative! Nurses and doctors clock is ticking the window of opportunity is slowly ending choices to be made money and your job or ending the strangle hold on the world. The time is NOW to become hero’s and come out against it all because soon very soon your days are done, don’t sink with the ship!

🔥23👍2

18 Oct 2022, 13:41 UTC≈2,550 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

🔥61

18 Oct 2022, 13:40 UTC≈2,200 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @praying_medic

The Indictment of Steve Bannon by the DOJ after his refusal to provide to the Jan 6th committee information that is protected by executive privilege can be seen as a template the deep state will likely apply to President Trump. A few days ago, Trump was subpoenaed by the Jan 6th committee and asked to provide certain documents. His fiery response indicates that he is not going to cooperate with their witch hunt. The

👍24🔥5

18 Oct 2022, 13:38 UTC≈1,740 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Quick note in light of the news this morning: I share information to the main channel as a means of staying informed. Who is doing what, who is saying what. As you know there is a great deal coming at us; information is being thrown around like a vintage rag doll. Just because I share something does it mean that I believe it? Do I have an emotional response to everything? Speaking for myself, the answer is no. M

🔥10👍2

18 Oct 2022, 13:38 UTC≈1,450 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5👍3

18 Oct 2022, 13:37 UTC≈1,360 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @timmy17seventysixPhoto

Nurse Erin sharing her link to this movie. https://www.therealanthonyfaucimovie.com/trailer?sub4=4602148b0044484488a4be2d672b7a34&afid=436

👍2🔥21

18 Oct 2022, 13:36 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightPhoto

More context from Gregg. Keyword to take away is “I think.” I can’t make a decision off of “I think”. Either you know or you don’t. People may take the advice if in fact sauce was provided. We’re not the “trust the science & don’t question anything” movement. We verify things before deciding what to do. Gregg Phillips says he is not on Telegram. I can’t disclose how I know, but that is false & I know he is/or at

🔥4👍1

18 Oct 2022, 13:36 UTC≈1,070 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightPhoto

Gregg Phillips warning to get off Telegram. A follow up post says I have zero trust in the TS platform. That might have been a autocorrect. Or was it? He does say everything is an info op. Then somebody asked if Greg’s account was hacked in an effort to cut off information. Gregg responded by saying he hit send too quick. My thoughts: I don’t know what’s up. Gregg is not sounding coherent tonight & he’s all over t

👍7🔥1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qflys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@QFlys🪰” (@qflys), 2,145 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qflys.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.