Why is the FBI's top child porn lawyer involved in the H. Biden laptop case? [special agent Joshua Wilson] Do you see a pattern? Q
π50π₯17β€2

Channel
@qflys
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
2,035subscribers
-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001363614521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qflys |
| Created | 15 February 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qflys |
Politics & activism β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 10:41 | 2,035 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:21 | 2,036 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:55 | 2,040 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:51 | 2,042 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:29 | 2,043 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 2,048 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:54 | 2,052 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:38 | 2,055 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 2,061 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 2,062 | -10 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 07:42 | 2,072 | -12 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 2,084 | -10 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 2,094 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 2,101 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 2,103 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 2,108 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:45 | 2,113 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 2,119 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 2,122 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 2,124 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 October 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
267 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 118 | 44.2% | |
| π₯ | 100 | 37.5% | |
| β€ | 47 | 17.6% | |
| π | 1 | 0.375% | |
| π€ | 1 | 0.375% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2022 to 18 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Why is the FBI's top child porn lawyer involved in the H. Biden laptop case? [special agent Joshua Wilson] Do you see a pattern? Q
π50π₯17β€2
Hydrogen Peroxide & Gregg Phillips :)
π19
FUCKING BOOM π₯ BANG ON TARGET π―
β€41π₯17
A lot of people better start blowing whistles or a lot of people are going down in the βI was just following orders,β Narrative! Nurses and doctors clock is ticking the window of opportunity is slowly ending choices to be made money and your job or ending the strangle hold on the world. The time is NOW to become heroβs and come out against it all because soon very soon your days are done, donβt sink with the ship!
π₯23π2
π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
π₯6β€1
The Indictment of Steve Bannon by the DOJ after his refusal to provide to the Jan 6th committee information that is protected by executive privilege can be seen as a template the deep state will likely apply to President Trump. A few days ago, Trump was subpoenaed by the Jan 6th committee and asked to provide certain documents. His fiery response indicates that he is not going to cooperate with their witch hunt. Theβ¦
π24π₯5
Quick note in light of the news this morning: I share information to the main channel as a means of staying informed. Who is doing what, who is saying what. As you know there is a great deal coming at us; information is being thrown around like a vintage rag doll. Just because I share something does it mean that I believe it? Do I have an emotional response to everything? Speaking for myself, the answer is no. Mβ¦
π₯10π2
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯5π3
Nurse Erin sharing her link to this movie. https://www.therealanthonyfaucimovie.com/trailer?sub4=4602148b0044484488a4be2d672b7a34&afid=436
π2π₯2β€1
π₯³π₯³π₯³
More context from Gregg. Keyword to take away is βI think.β I canβt make a decision off of βI thinkβ. Either you know or you donβt. People may take the advice if in fact sauce was provided. Weβre not the βtrust the science & donβt question anythingβ movement. We verify things before deciding what to do. Gregg Phillips says he is not on Telegram. I canβt disclose how I know, but that is false & I know he is/or at β¦
π₯4π1
Gregg Phillips warning to get off Telegram. A follow up post says I have zero trust in the TS platform. That might have been a autocorrect. Or was it? He does say everything is an info op. Then somebody asked if Gregβs account was hacked in an effort to cut off information. Gregg responded by saying he hit send too quick. My thoughts: I donβt know whatβs up. Gregg is not sounding coherent tonight & heβs all over tβ¦
π7π₯1π€1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qflys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
β@QFlysπͺ°β (@qflys), 2,035 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qflys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.